From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#19883: Correction for backtrace Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:55:04 +0100 Message-ID: <874mq7vfuv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87twyln70f.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <873865n2rr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87twy91vtc.fsf@gnu.org> <878ufld1iw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87k2z4dhx7.fsf@gnu.org> <874mq8dfb3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fv9sahxx.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq34bsh7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wq34zghp.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhjkbhlp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425030981 10907 80.91.229.3 (27 Feb 2015 09:56:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19883@debbugs.gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 27 10:56:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YRHeR-0007PG-NG for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:56:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34762 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRHeR-0001OK-55 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:56:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRHeN-0001Lw-LN for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:56:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRHeM-00089e-Qw for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:56:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRHeM-00089X-OZ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YRHeM-0004AG-8O for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19883 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19883-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19883.142503091115938 (code B ref 19883); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19883) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2015 09:55:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59256 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YRHdW-000490-UY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:55:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:47046 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YRHdU-00048s-KP for 19883@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:55:09 -0500 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:51045 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRHdT-0001oZ-JG; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:55:07 -0500 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 9 =?UTF-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 223 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <87lhjkbhlp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Thu, 26 Feb 2015 20:25:22 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:7733 Archived-At: David Kastrup skribis: > Three years ago in August there was a meeting of developers at my house, > a lot of information was passed around and in a concerted effort > LilyPond-2.16.0 was released. > > Since then all developments would properly be labelled a one-person > project or side-project. OK. I viewed LilyPond as a project with more people involved. > Now if you take a look at GUILE=C2=A02.1 development, in particular all > commits that are _not_ merges from the 2.0 branch, you'll find that > quite more than 90% have come from the same person. > > LilyPond development is quite more diverse, but the various changes in > the last years have invariably been one-person projects. > > Of the three large GUILE-based applications Gnucash, TeXmacs, and > LilyPond, the only successful migration to GUILEv2 so far has been > Gnucash, and its integration with GUILE is much smaller than that of > LilyPond. > > The one-person projects concerning finding and/or fixing language and > compiler problems or restructuring the related code areas have been > exclusively mine. That is not necessarily a good match since my > productivity drops to near zero when I lose interest with a problem, and > without anybody else keeping the ball rolling, it can easily stay there. Sure. There=E2=80=99s quite a number of names showing up in the lilypond-d= evel archive though. We need them to feel concerned about this. Ludo=E2=80=99.