From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#20017: guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:09:01 +0200 Message-ID: <874m8jopk2.fsf@pobox.com> References: <54F9B264.8070106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <8737o4p1rq.fsf@pobox.com> <576C0027.10502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466698228 13782 80.91.229.3 (23 Jun 2016 16:10:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20017-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Normand Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 23 18:10:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bG7Co-0004RB-6w for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:10:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37826 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG7Cn-0005z3-8o for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:10:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG7Ch-0005xI-Q7 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:10:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG7Cc-0004Bs-PG for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40527) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG7Cc-0004Bi-Lr for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG7Cc-000619-Ih for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:10:02 -0400 Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 20017 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 20017@debbugs.gnu.org, wingo@pobox.com, normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com Original-Received: via spool by 20017-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D20017.146669815423065 (code D ref 20017); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20017-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 16:09:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52862 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG7Bp-0005zx-DZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:09:13 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:62488 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG7Bn-0005zp-Jf for 20017-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:09:11 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAF1242B4; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:09:09 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=oGVrA8aKf3VBSWq2Kh5EZJwqeos=; b=UFfWG6 VA/xbWQkYCwhHuNx7Opdq25BWnZlcCELoswJwYNceR3VPpCScTKos4RCqDYV9wy1 OZOHn7uE+mGTVGbTkIVi53hX2HLpq+bFeXKkJdBw4R1up38kBFekEY2vdq+a9Cqe m1FxbDaRz18F8ekvaAdeQ2LuLiNbvXdg5dHAg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Fjxo4yGMDW1eJypWJcdsTHMOAwgCHQOi wK8/TCvDoKdf74dhZ/zccWf6K+tdmPXjoQCdnKMvNFkDSy8z/8EMrnP6SFyGXbcC q5f+ZcaAN1cR82I9NItV+2tfbAxstyTrNPDhxrtqhaEBOI2YMwE08jx+B4f0y+I6 3ma0NIpuyXQ= Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428E8242B3; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:09:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67037242B2; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:09:08 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <576C0027.10502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com's message of "Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:28:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D0F060F6-395C-11E6-B679-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8168 Archived-At: On Thu 23 Jun 2016 17:28, Normand writes: >> (expt 2 1/2) >> (expt 2.0 1/2) >> (sqrt 2) > > The bugzilla should probably be closed now, > because since then it seems that problem disapeared. > If I do the manual tests as suggested there is no differences in expressions outputs as reported below. Cool, that was easy :-) Happy hacking, Andy