[patch] 1.6.4: configure syntax error with autoconf 2.59

[patch] 1.6.4: configure syntax error with autoconf 2.59

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

Hello,

 As of autoconf 2.59 due to the way AC_LIBOBJ gets expanded, the resulting 
configure script contains "; fi" alone in a line, which is not accepted at 
least by bash 2.05b.  Here is an obvious fix.

2004-07-30  Maciej W. Rozycki  <macro@linux-mips.org>

	* configure.in: Reformat a conditional statement to place
	AC_LIBOBJ alone in a line.
	* configure: Regenerate.

 Please apply.

  Maciej

guile-1.6.4-ac.patch
diff -up --recursive --new-file guile-1.6.4.macro/configure.in guile-1.6.4/configure.in
--- guile-1.6.4.macro/configure.in	2002-12-08 01:48:52.000000000 +0000
+++ guile-1.6.4/configure.in	2004-07-26 22:40:49.000000000 +0000
@@ -462,7 +462,9 @@ AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(inet_aton putenv strerr
 # explicitly to LIBOBJS to make sure that it is translated to
 # `alloca.lo' for libtool later on.  This can and should be done more cleanly.
 AC_FUNC_ALLOCA
-if test "$ALLOCA" = "alloca.o"; then AC_LIBOBJ([alloca]); fi
+if test "$ALLOCA" = "alloca.o"; then
+	AC_LIBOBJ([alloca])
+fi
 
 AC_CHECK_MEMBERS([struct stat.st_rdev])
 AC_CHECK_MEMBERS([struct stat.st_blksize])


_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: [patch] 1.6.4: configure syntax error with autoconf 2.59

[Kevin Ryde]

"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> writes:
>
>  As of autoconf 2.59 due to the way AC_LIBOBJ gets expanded, the resulting 
> configure script contains "; fi" alone in a line, which is not accepted at 
> least by bash 2.05b.

Thanks, that's been fixed in the cvs I think.


_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile