From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Fix for _Complex_I problems Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:44:37 +0000 Message-ID: <873arxvr9m.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <534824.44153.qm@web37914.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <47A031C6.2030106@dpawson.co.uk> <87odb3uguq.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <47A18131.3090503@dpawson.co.uk> <871w7wiep3.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ir15aw7s.fsf@dellish.bordeaux.inria.fr> <87ve50qpms.fsf_-_@ossau.uklinux.net> <874pcjyfas.fsf@dellish.bordeaux.inria.fr> <87abmbw8du.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87k5leklkb.fsf_-_@ossau.uklinux.net> <87fxw2kl5r.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202849176 4459 80.91.229.12 (12 Feb 2008 20:46:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Bugs , ludovic.courtes@inria.fr, =?iso-8859-1?Q?=28Ludovic_Court=E8s=29?=@ir.bbn.com To: Greg Troxel Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 12 21:46:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JP211-0006ae-Kr for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:46:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JP20Y-0003zd-7D for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:45:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JP1zf-0003Y1-4H for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:44:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JP1zd-0003XB-GE for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:44:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JP1zd-0003X7-9D for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:44:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JP1zc-0006Yq-R8 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:44:41 -0500 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-145-183-175.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.183.175]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17541F6787; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:44:38 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [192.168.0.10]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821173800A; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:44:37 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: (Greg Troxel's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:32:12 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3785 Archived-At: Greg Troxel writes: > Looking over your patch again, I feel quite a bit better about it. [...] > I would add > > # This is a workaround for the failure of these systems to conform to C99. > > So this all seems ok to me. Hi Greg, Many thanks for your review, thoughts and second thoughts. I agree that it's a good idea to add the extra sentence that you've suggested, so I'll do that now. Regards, Neil