From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10517: Corrected patch: Make notation for Scheme variable-length arguments more consistent in manual. Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:05:09 +0100 Message-ID: <8739asktqi.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87y5t8hhku.fsf@goof.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328297325 13020 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2012 19:28:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 19:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10517-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 10516-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: b3timmons@speedymail.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 03 20:28:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RtOoK-0005A1-6X for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:28:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40830 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtOoJ-0001rG-L1 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:28:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtOoF-0001lR-2Z for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:28:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtOoC-0003EM-AH for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:28:34 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtOoC-0003E8-2A for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:28:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtOok-0001Sg-11 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:29:06 -0500 Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:29:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 10517 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 10517@debbugs.gnu.org, wingo@pobox.com Original-Received: via spool by 10517-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D10517.13282973325534 (code D ref 10517); Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:29:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10517-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2012 19:28:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52646 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtOoW-0001R8-C9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:28:52 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:57365 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtOoU-0001Qr-2D; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:28:50 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94DD91CC; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:28:15 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=S+A9n2cHNMG5Rzr8KYGVS+CUZDk=; b=JpYdeB HIYn0+MLtGx1B/de/l+SJMlnlcTQ+CcU5awXoq1pq4r/HnTAFCgYFey82vygdPgM zFVcEmjNIh37/bMsw28RfiGOExU0JIN9jNXD8R5nYSfk4LG6nZrYdvGWD1HG8rP3 od9iaTUXfN9P2g6H/5C/LMDvZL+koBRK6hv+g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=NDA/sOUrRIfNMIw0vyJGoB4MM1hYxSvY FnfPdz8AbLfLkHGpFoTF69Wpypw7s8lLKfEV4hRRGhKvp4rT/Rwi61S9DQFV6VkZ s6UIlc5kSXjoAwAJcK+H5PtyZYc7g5CpBUGgV5206A0OognMHG4pL0V2KOfvaJ/J +ZxZkZLH7/w= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04F691CB; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:28:15 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [94.139.51.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E47491CA; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:28:15 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87y5t8hhku.fsf@goof.localdomain> (Bake Timmons's message of "Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:49:21 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 37E6537E-4E9D-11E1-8075-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6180 Archived-At: On Sun 15 Jan 2012 20:49, Bake Timmons writes: > I'm sorry for that previous patch which included some typos. The fixed > patch is attached. Thanks! Hum, I had applied your original patch already, resolving a conflict due to the Parameters move; saw one typo in srfi-modules.texi and fixed it. Hope that was OK. In the future it's best to either use the same bug, by replying to the mail that debbugs sends you, or to close the previous bug. That way people can opportunistically deal with one bug without having to look at all bugs :-) Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/