From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#19237: Guile-2.0.11 OS X 10.10.1 build error Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:47:43 -0500 Message-ID: <87388v6kps.fsf@yeeloong.lan> References: <33812EC5-B247-42F7-B602-7C3E61FAFEF6@telia.com> <87k3282x2z.fsf@gnu.org> <790BA86E-780F-427E-B671-C9B844FA6FE0@telia.com> <87r3wf1g87.fsf@gnu.org> <13044C92-0817-4F77-AE56-CA40B55C2B20@telia.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417737026 18347 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2014 23:50:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 23:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 19237-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Hans Aberg Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 05 00:50:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XwgA4-0000Is-Ex for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:50:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48175 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwgA3-0006LK-W8 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:50:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xwg9v-0006Iz-Td for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xwg9q-00036Y-PT for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:50:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xwg9q-000360-MD for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xwg9p-0006N9-R9 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 23:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19237 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19237-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D19237.141773697124451 (code D ref 19237); Thu, 04 Dec 2014 23:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19237-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2014 23:49:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54123 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xwg9K-0006MJ-Lh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:49:30 -0500 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:57035) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xwg9H-0006M7-N8 for 19237-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:49:28 -0500 Original-Received: from c-24-62-95-23.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.62.95.23] helo=yeeloong.lan) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Xwg9A-0004dd-HF; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:49:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <13044C92-0817-4F77-AE56-CA40B55C2B20@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Thu, 4 Dec 2014 20:28:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:7662 Archived-At: Hans Aberg writes: >> On 4 Dec 2014, at 18:23, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>=20 >> Hans Aberg skribis: >>=20 >>>> On 3 Dec 2014, at 23:21, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Could it be because Guile is being compiled against libeditline instead >>>> of GNU Readline? >>>>=20 >>>> Readline support in Guile requires GNU Readline. >>>=20 >>> It looked as though that the readline in the Guile distribution is too >>> old - no other readline installed on the system. >>=20 >> Actually there=E2=80=99s no Readline in Guile itself, just the guile-rea= dline >> bindings. > > I think the binding problem was that what Guile expected to be in one > file, readline now has in several. Can you explain this more clearly? What do you think Guile expects to be in one file that "readline now has in several"? Also, how did you reach this conclusion, given that GNU Readline apparently wasn't installed when the build failed? FWIW, we regularly build the latest Guile with the latest Readline in GNU Guix, and haven't run into this problem. Regards, Mark