unofficial mirror of bug-guile@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: 20302@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20302: peek-char messes up file position on binary string ports
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 01:29:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87383z5nmj.fsf@netris.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y4lylwch.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Sat, 11 Apr 2015 13:48:14 +0200")

David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:

> (use-modules (rnrs bytevectors) (rnrs io ports))
> (let ((port (open-bytevector-input-port
> 	     (string->utf8 "Blablabla\nBlablabla\n"))))
>   (seek port 13 SEEK_SET)
>   (format #t "~c ~d\n" (peek-char port)
> 	  (ftell port)))
> ;; Outputs b 3 but should output b 13
>
> This is using
> guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.11
> Packaged by Debian (2.0.11-deb+1-1)

Ouch :-(

The problem is that r6rs-ports.c:bip_seek assumes that
c_port->read_{buf,pos,end} point to the original bytevector, and fail to
handle the case where it points to a "putback" buffer.

Note that (ftell port) is equivalent to (seek port 0 SEEK_CUR).

> Any idea how to work around _this_ one?

While investigating possible workarounds, I noticed that, afaict, we did
_not_ make the incompatible change in 2.0.11 that you claim we made in
<http://bugs.gnu.org/20109>.  That change was only made on our master
branch, which will become 2.2.

In response to that bug report, I suggested that you use bytevector
input ports instead of string ports, and that's what led you to hit this
problem.

Now my suggestion is that you continue using string ports in 2.0.11 or
earlier, and use bytevector inputs ports in 2.0.12 or later.  I'll make
sure this bug is fixed in 2.0.12.

Please let me know if you think I'm mistaken in any of this.  If so, I
have some other possible workarounds to offer, but I think they will not
be needed.

      Mark





  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-17  5:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-11 11:48 bug#20302: peek-char messes up file position on binary string ports David Kastrup
2015-04-17  5:29 ` Mark H Weaver [this message]
2015-09-06 11:55   ` Mark H Weaver
2015-11-04 21:12     ` Mark H Weaver
     [not found] ` <handler.20302.B.142875290514957.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
2015-08-31  9:09   ` bug#20302: Acknowledgement (peek-char messes up file position on binary string ports) David Kastrup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87383z5nmj.fsf@netris.org \
    --to=mhw@netris.org \
    --cc=20302@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=dak@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).