From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#21181: Possible bug in test-group Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:29:25 -0500 Message-ID: <8738016llm.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <87d1z56ogp.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87a8u96o4j.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87614x6nq1.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438576226 20293 80.91.229.3 (3 Aug 2015 04:30:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 04:30:26 +0000 (UTC) To: 21181@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 03 06:30:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM7OB-00049d-VT for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 06:30:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57495 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM7OB-0008Lj-0F for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM7O7-0008Lc-Qo for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM7O1-0002B5-Ob for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36245) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM7O1-0002AM-Mf for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM7O0-0003QE-IV for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:30:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Rob Browning Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 04:30:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21181 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21181-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21181.143857617013094 (code B ref 21181); Mon, 03 Aug 2015 04:30:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21181) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2015 04:29:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37691 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM7NS-0003P8-BD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:29:30 -0400 Original-Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:58170) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM7NQ-0003P0-8u for 21181@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:29:28 -0400 Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E29F8200F0 for <21181@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 23:29:26 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A387414E08D; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 23:29:25 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <87614x6nq1.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:7822 Archived-At: Rob Browning writes: > To follow up, it does look like it might be broken, but you can ignore > my suggested fix. I'm not that familiar with srfi-64, but it looks like the problem (if it's not expected) is that test-group doesn't handle the case where it's creating the first group, i.e. no prior test-begin. In that situation it appears that test-runner-current returns #f, causing test-result-alist! to fail. Hope this helps -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4