From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#20272: Support reproducible builds Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:22:37 +0200 Message-ID: <8737o3n20y.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87twws88hr.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb5vn2nw.fsf@netris.org> <87a8n5vqn0.fsf@netris.org> <8737o7hndq.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466709813 6397 80.91.229.3 (23 Jun 2016 19:23:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20272@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 23 21:23:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bGADc-0004kV-9a for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:23:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38894 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGADb-00037e-7e for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGADT-00034m-2z for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGADO-0005F5-1t for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGADN-0005Ev-VD for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGADN-0004GR-Qs for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20272 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 20272-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20272.146670976916367 (code B ref 20272); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20272) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 19:22:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52994 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGADB-0004Fv-1A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:22:49 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.67]:60198 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGAD9-0004Fo-I1 for 20272@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:22:47 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2734025F8D; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:22:46 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=o8dox7vTyFUrJLHLW9TvH6NgyFk=; b=aFMfw1 EehhBy2hJmoqzu2AlERpY1eJ++OE0SAkYM0kcPRZJhGzwmGfrsNkd2v505/vcxYr DJ6XERoIIz+aMgBIucDrugBTigyt0nF7EXLbXSd+g4xRJbwK+lpNMX8UjY2t/2ON oBXwq9YLL55hEZuFMe5AS7jGecsQFBxFxkM2k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ckiYCuLUpmfX8ul2A6VNuaZPMNisJqZG eAER1RB9DcR4J4j7ihCcCXIs3jJWDiPl/L8LpZNVpdmOjTREUmQ/SYZX4LRmW4g7 wzlraz/J0DypLtcT+B3+m/0I700QHvN0IQvlVrWh70MNR8JuadNn0GG7BRyngwNd zrSE2xAsP/4= Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F48025F8C; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:22:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C94F25F8B; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:22:45 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8737o7hndq.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:48:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DD200E42-3977-11E6-B367-28A6F1301B6D-02397024!pb-sasl2.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8179 Archived-At: On Mon 20 Jun 2016 17:48, Andy Wingo writes: >>> Currently, we include both the session-id and a global gensym counter in >>> the names of freshly generated marks and labels in psyntax.scm. >>> Instead, let them include the module name and a per-module counter. >> >> I've attached a preliminary implementation of this idea, but I'm not yet >> confident in its correctness. > > Looks pretty good to me but I think we should put it off until after > 2.0.12, just so we can get the release out the door. WDYT? On the other hand, maybe including it in 2.0.12 is the right thing; dunno. What do you think? Andy