From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomas Nordin Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#68350: Segmentation fault using list-head with negative k Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 19:36:06 +0000 Message-ID: <8734v6s3ix.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26350"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: 68350@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 09 20:37:27 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rNHug-0006kw-CB for guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 20:37:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNHuD-0004fh-Nu; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:36:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNHuB-0004aW-Mr for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:36:55 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNHuB-0001g6-D3 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:36:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNHuI-0006D3-14 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tomas Nordin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 19:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 68350 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.170482899823830 (code B ref -1); Tue, 09 Jan 2024 19:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2024 19:36:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40996 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNHtu-0006CI-17 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:36:38 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:53012) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNHtr-0006Bv-PP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:36:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNHtZ-0004QK-1Y for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:36:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNHtV-0001Ui-S1 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:36:15 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5451C240101 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 20:36:09 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1704828969; bh=7pSLHVhRUMor68uqS8wk3R55LnQtB/rZMCTmp2p8b6w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=EKI8dlR5WDjj/TJdlDLNrw2XwECBEue4eaG1Q/yEg5ZIONUHQdBqFSIr1NVe6Fbvl oz8hdXk4twbg6ag/cI0OVnr2PzYJnZ9ZRr9Aim5hyEv5VjMTYV+UkbM0XL0kHJr/cX 2u8F2nOQ6WC4f5W5bkJSF2goWOj9Pa98fTLGjxlw3KQIGkyXnHG/om1qeksT2N5T6t Q6tmZ500Ov9r8vyJwZGDQEQ6FzYplLN5BgXSEfCbQl9xYbWgciX1GaHQ0dFH+bn09g hD6pDs7ezoJvl2z89hFrLe3gcLMXYdvvDgaG3iF4kl1KC95TOqo1CrsauPZ+X2mg3w 6gC0Py4+HDxVA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4T8h4S62JFz6tv5 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 20:36:08 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=tomasn@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:10742 Archived-At: Hello List If this has been reported before I didn't find it. Here's the recipe: $ guile -q GNU Guile 3.0.8 Copyright (C) 1995-2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'. This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details. Enter `,help' for help. scheme@(guile-user)> (list-head '(1 2 3) -1) Segmentation fault Argument -1 is an improper argument and an error is expected, but not a segmentation fault. With positive integers out of bounds I see an exception, not segfault. This is an apt-installed guile on Debian $ dpkg -l | grep guile ii guile-3.0 3.0.8-2 amd64 GNU extension language and Scheme interpreter ii guile-3.0-doc 3.0.8-2 all Documentation for Guile 3.0 ii guile-3.0-libs:amd64 3.0.8-2 amd64 Core Guile libraries Thanks for all the work -- Tomas