From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#18495: Alternatives!?! Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:42:49 -0400 Message-ID: <871tr6mpiu.fsf@yeeloong.lan> References: <1411025555-32284-1-git-send-email-dak@gnu.org> <87lhphs46q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1411218681 17773 80.91.229.3 (20 Sep 2014 13:11:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18495-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 20 15:11:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XVKRR-0004lI-DU for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 15:11:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34516 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVKRQ-00027R-K3 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 09:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42111) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVKRI-00025H-QP for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 09:11:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVKRB-0001jh-2u for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 09:11:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54870) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVKRA-0001ib-Vt for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 09:10:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XVK2B-0001mV-Dk for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:45:03 -0400 Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 18495 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Mail-Followup-To: 18495@debbugs.gnu.org, mhw@netris.org, dak@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 18495-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D18495.14112170966816 (code D ref 18495); Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18495-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2014 12:44:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46422 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XVK23-0001lq-NH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:44:55 -0400 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:49163) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XVK20-0001lh-Jf for 18495-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:44:53 -0400 Original-Received: from c-98-217-13-77.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.217.13.77] helo=yeeloong.lan) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XVK1t-000643-VD; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:44:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lhphs46q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:50:21 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:7555 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > * libguile/smob.h (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC, SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_0_LOC) > (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_1_LOC, SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_2_LOC) > (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_3_LOC): These elementary API macros have been broken > by commit 56164dc47f6616b359f0ad23be208f01a77b55fa in 2009 Ouch. I've pushed this to stable-2.0, commit 8442211ef0029581b35f784489afcf210491fc41. I'm closing this bug. > will there be something like an official guarantee that using > the undocumented SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_N_LOC will be supported for several > years? I think that's the best option. Just use SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_N_LOC. Mark