From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#14361: Building guile 2.0.9 under mingw + msys Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:51:45 +0300 Message-ID: <8337o23oem.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pqerdxq4.fsf@pobox.com> <83ehuy698u.fsf@gnu.org> <8362ga5h7h.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4ywpnv0.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4yw49u6.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5smnj86.fsf@pobox.com> <83ehudp29y.fsf@gnu.org> <87fw0s2tmx.fsf@pobox.com> <83a9r0p4jw.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjythmj1.fsf@pobox.com> <83fvxyemk2.fsf@gnu.org> <8737o77e3n.fsf@pobox.com> <83mvme7lqs.fsf@gnu.org> <8760t2y42q.fsf@pobox.com> <83y45y5z0y.fsf@gnu.org> <87ziqeuuwa.fsf@pobox.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466762009 26908 80.91.229.3 (24 Jun 2016 09:53:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14361@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 24 11:53:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bGNna-0000BF-PZ for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:53:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42235 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGNnV-0000Zs-2V for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGNnP-0000Zl-2B for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGNnK-0002p5-5F for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41099) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGNnK-0002on-1M for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGNnJ-000482-Qw for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:53:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14361 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14361-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14361.146676196615848 (code B ref 14361); Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14361) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2016 09:52:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53436 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGNn0-00047V-Vz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:52:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39199) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGNmy-00047E-Ly for 14361@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:52:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGNms-0002Y5-CZ for 14361@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:52:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGNmp-0002Wr-MH; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:52:31 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3881 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bGNmn-0000k4-SN; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:52:30 -0400 In-reply-to: <87ziqeuuwa.fsf@pobox.com> (message from Andy Wingo on Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:52:37 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8218 Archived-At: > From: Andy Wingo > Cc: 14361@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:52:37 +0200 > > On Tue 21 Jun 2016 17:42, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Andy Wingo > >> Cc: 14361@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org > >> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:06:05 +0200 > >> > >> Let's give it a go! I understand that you do not want to work with > >> gnulib. That's a negative from a Guile POV -- but it's not a > >> deal-breaker. > > > > I have nothing against Gnulib, but in this case their solution is > > simply not up to speed. > > > >> To that end I hesitate about including a bunch more stuff in > >> posix.c. Must it all be there, or would it be possible to move some > >> of it out to our own gnulib-like mingw-w32.[ch] or something? > > > > Most of it is already on a separate file, w32-proc.c (see the diffs). > > I could take the macros at the beginning of posix.c and put them on a > > separate .h file, if that would be better. > > That would be great, if you'd be amenable. Thanks! Done and posted on guile-devel. Thanks.