From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Neil Jerram" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: [bug #24554] Pthreads and Stack overflow in guile (reopen bug 20814?) (guile 1.8.5) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:53:42 +0100 Message-ID: <49dd78620810140153k73a785f4od4a48cf7de228fb2@mail.gmail.com> References: <20081014-013958.sv70242.45488@savannah.gnu.org> <20081014-030557.sv70242.10323@savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1223974607 7046 80.91.229.12 (14 Oct 2008 08:56:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, Kannan Vijayan To: "Kannan Vijayan" Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 14 10:57:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kpfiq-0007ne-I1 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:57:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33309 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kpfhl-00044i-SA for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kpff1-0003J8-DK for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:53:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kpfey-0003IA-PT for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:53:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57561 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kpfey-0003Hy-9H for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:53:44 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.249]:4565) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kpfex-00026R-Pq for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:53:44 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so2385807rvb.6 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:53:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7uW5vNU5rFeSaK7TggvBTkI8XTQ68UdkUGZ3ydwKZeI=; b=smRZimAajVlfKzl3doCVRtao7FfLkO8znCfI1NklOaINuVhEn61E/IbeBuzrnrg+Vw WLLrJrYhrB0sA+8xIcKQn3ghlQERM4aP1/hWg4zE1kVoxX7tchx5JSNnWwj+3zTUTBLN z0VnqLe3fTVe9LcewbBeqFHonIuQ80ZRwHKe0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Ws5E6WGxxnAiGZDxUaUKTYUvEEQAx6ASuZQ+sKLYGgOnkssW5kOph4akkMX+bYW9/8 WbdwNyyAdgBv6909qyQ/KlneXWgy7YyT1OB9UudZSIpm+iI3x7QrTxNKaM8r/dHBaZ7K Oo3BbWkp589uBNXXwBAqRttVBV00ohz3YOkXE= Original-Received: by 10.140.191.14 with SMTP id o14mr4633827rvf.130.1223974422088; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.141.177.4 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:53:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20081014-030557.sv70242.10323@savannah.gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4048 Archived-At: 2008/10/14 Kannan Vijayan : > > Follow-up Comment #1, bug #24554 (project guile): > > > Hrm, this may be a non-issue after-all. Digging through the source, I > discovered the SCM_USE_PTHREAD_THREADS macro referred to in key places > (crucially, the one-time thread initialization code called by scm_with_guile > and scm_init_guile). > > >From what I can see, it seems that the default debian build of the guile dev > package does not seem to have this flag enabled. Yes, that's it. See here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/7754 > If this is the reason for my problems, I guess it's not an issue to be > addressed here. My apologies. No problem. I'd rather get a duplicate report than no report at all! Regards, Neil