unofficial mirror of bug-guile@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Aberg <haberg@math.su.se>
To: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>,
	bug-libtool@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Mac OS X .dylib not working
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:40:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <470370CA-2B7D-49F3-B48C-70B0731757F9@math.su.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.2.01.1002021046230.17824@freddy.simplesystems.org>

On 2 Feb 2010, at 17:52, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:

> Under OS-X (Leopard and later), the 'dtruss' program can be used to  
> see what is really going on.

While at it, I found another problem involving libltdl.7.dylib,  
guile-1.8.7 and lilypond 2.13.7:

When upgrading guile using libtool-2.2.6b, lilypond broke, the one  
which is in an Application distribution:
   /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/guile
It has its own
   /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/lib/libltdl.7.dylib

However, dtruss shows that segmentation fault is caused when calling
   /usr/local/lib/libltdl.7.dylib

When I move this to another name, then lilypond works, but dtruss now  
shows that it calls
   /usr/lib/libltdl.7.dylib

So it seems lilypond never calls its own libltdl.7.dylib.

The problem here, though, is the combination of incompatible versions  
of libltdl.7.dylib in combination with a library search path. If they  
really are incompatible, there seems to be no point in having a  
searchpath.

I think that gcc on Mac OS X makes hardcoded full paths for libraries.  
So libtool would then implement its own library search paths.

Also, it seems having no problem open .dylib files here.

   Hans






  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-04 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-01 14:26 Mac OS X .dylib not working Hans Aberg
2010-02-02  6:42 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2010-02-02  9:08   ` Hans Aberg
2010-02-02 14:20     ` Ken Raeburn
2010-02-02 15:48       ` Hans Aberg
2010-02-02 16:52         ` Bob Friesenhahn
2010-02-02 17:15           ` Hans Aberg
2010-02-02 18:01             ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-02-03 14:23               ` Ken Raeburn
2010-02-03 15:10                 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-02-04 12:40           ` Hans Aberg [this message]
2010-02-04 13:49             ` Peter O'Gorman
2010-02-04 15:21               ` Hans Aberg
2010-02-04 15:34                 ` Peter O'Gorman
2010-02-04 16:52                   ` Hans Aberg
2010-02-04 16:58                   ` Hans Aberg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-03 19:32 Hans Åberg
2011-03-03 19:56 ` Michael Ellis
2011-03-04  2:59   ` Peter O'Gorman
2011-03-04  3:41     ` Michael Ellis
2011-03-04  8:59     ` Andy Wingo
2011-03-04  9:44     ` Hans Aberg
2011-03-04 18:07       ` Peter O'Gorman
2011-03-04 18:47         ` Ralf Wildenhues
2011-03-04 19:00           ` Peter O'Gorman
2011-03-05 16:16             ` Peter O'Gorman
2011-03-04  3:00 ` Bob Friesenhahn
2011-03-04  3:48   ` Michael Ellis
2011-03-04 17:04     ` Ralf Wildenhues
2011-03-04  9:47   ` Hans Aberg
2011-03-03 19:53 Hans Aberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=470370CA-2B7D-49F3-B48C-70B0731757F9@math.su.se \
    --to=haberg@math.su.se \
    --cc=bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us \
    --cc=bug-guile@gnu.org \
    --cc=bug-libtool@gnu.org \
    --cc=raeburn@raeburn.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).