From: Nils Durner <ndurner@web.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch] --with-threads on MinGW
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 22:18:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <457490A5.80601@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87veks33jf.fsf@zip.com.au>
>> -#ifdef HAVE_STRUCT_TIMESPEC
>> +#if HAVE_STRUCT_TIMESPEC || SCM_I_GSC_USE_PTHREAD_THREADS
>> pf ("typedef struct timespec scm_t_timespec;\n");
>
> Does the detection of struct timespec go wrong somehow?
The only timespec declaration on Win32 is the one in pthread.h, that's
why I or'ed SCM_I_GSC_USE_PTHREAD_THREADS.
scm's own timespec declaration is considered "incompatible" for some reason.
>> +#ifndef __MINGW32__
>> + sigset_t all_sigs;
>> +
>> sigfillset (&all_sigs);
>> scm_i_pthread_sigmask (SIG_SETMASK, &all_sigs, NULL);
>> +#endif
>
> I think I'd rather either conditionalize on the existance of
> pthread_sigmask, or perhaps make some dummy sigset stuff if it doesn't
> exist.
OK, makes sense.
>> +#ifndef __MINGW32__
>> + t->pthread,
>> +#else
>> + t->pthread.p,
>> +#endif
>
> What does that do?
Pthreads-win32 defines pthread_t as struct.
>> #if SCM_USE_PTHREAD_THREADS
>> /* pthread_getattr_np not available on MacOS X and Solaris 10. */
>> -#if HAVE_PTHREAD_ATTR_GETSTACK && HAVE_PTHREAD_GETATTR_NP
>> +#if (HAVE_PTHREAD_ATTR_GETSTACK && HAVE_PTHREAD_GETATTR_NP) ||
>> __MINGW32__
>
> Remind us what's wrong with the getstack detection ...
pthread_attr_getstack() exists, but pthread_getattr_np() doesn't.
This is just to get the #define HAVE_GET_... and the definition of
get_thread_stack_base().
Nils
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-04 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-03 18:26 [Patch] --with-threads on MinGW Nils Durner
2006-12-04 0:31 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-12-04 21:18 ` Nils Durner [this message]
2006-12-13 23:29 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-12-13 23:55 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-12-14 0:09 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-12-14 22:12 ` Nils Durner
2006-12-15 0:24 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-12-14 0:40 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-12-14 0:12 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-12-14 21:42 ` Nils Durner
2006-12-15 0:25 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-12-27 0:10 ` Kevin Ryde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=457490A5.80601@web.de \
--to=ndurner@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).