From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nils Durner Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Win32/MinGW port Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 12:29:58 +0200 Message-ID: <452781A6.9010408@web.de> References: <4521596B.4030104@web.de> <87bqoulany.fsf@zip.com.au> <45218382.1050503@web.de> <87r6xnu47p.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160217071 27371 80.91.229.2 (7 Oct 2006 10:31:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 07 12:31:10 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GW9SX-0003xr-9I for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2006 12:31:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GW9SW-0004uM-OD for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2006 06:31:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GW9SR-0004pL-LD for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2006 06:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GW9SP-0004ja-Ih for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2006 06:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GW9SP-0004jL-DH for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2006 06:31:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [84.57.148.230] (helo=enterprise) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GW9ZU-0002D7-Bz for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2006 06:38:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] (dell [192.168.0.3]) by enterprise (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A77F260 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2006 12:31:10 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) Original-To: bug-guile@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87r6xnu47p.fsf@zip.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3363 Archived-At: > How bad are the missing bits? It's not too bad. pthreads-win32 is fairly complete and working. The mentioned functions are missing because Windows lacks the concept of signals altogether. > Should configure reject it because > there's no pthread_sigmask, or is there something the code can do to > cope? As there are no signals on Win32, I *think* it is okay to just "ifndef MINGW" the code. Regarding the undefined "pipe()": the easiest thing to do would be to define pipe() in the following way: #include #define pipe(f) _pipe(f, 1000, _O_BINARY) _pipe() takes two additional parameters: size in bytes and file mode. Note that these pipes are blocking. Nils _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile