From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Llorens Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#13966: inlining issue? Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:57:26 +0100 Message-ID: <41C98E11-DE0A-432E-9947-7F75B572FB12@bluewin.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1363352827 15960 80.91.229.3 (15 Mar 2013 13:07:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:07:07 +0000 (UTC) To: 13966@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 15 14:07:31 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UGULz-0008FX-3w for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:07:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35681 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGULc-0004Di-Do for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:07:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60019) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGULS-00044J-8N for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:06:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGULN-0001fl-Lm for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:06:50 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGULN-0001fh-IU for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:06:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UGUMc-0004Qo-7j for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daniel Llorens Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 13966 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136335282916941 (code B ref -1); Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Mar 2013 13:07:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55658 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UGULk-0004PA-3l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:07:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48025) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UGULg-0004Of-V0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGUJt-00010a-NY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:05:42 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:43822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGUJt-0000mK-Kd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:05:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56281) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGUCR-0000PC-P5 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:57:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGUCQ-0006MB-HN for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:57:31 -0400 Original-Received: from zhhdzmsp-smta18.bluewin.ch ([195.186.227.133]:64931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGUCQ-0006Lm-Aj for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:57:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.186.99.130] ([195.186.99.130:42138] helo=zhbdzmsp-smta11.bluewin.ch) by zhhdzmsp-smta18.bluewin.ch (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.47 r(39824M)) with ESMTP id C5/B4-12532-7BA13415; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:57:28 +0000 Original-Received: from [172.16.96.17] (62.2.203.131) by zhbdzmsp-smta11.bluewin.ch (8.5.142) (authenticated as dll@bluewin.ch) id 510085AB047A1C80 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:57:27 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6969 Archived-At: Compare=20 (define f (lambda (a) a)) (call-with-values (lambda () (values 3 3)) f) vs (call-with-values (lambda () (values 3 3)) (lambda (a) a)) The first one fails with :1:0: In procedure f: :1:0: Wrong number of arguments to # The second one gives 3.=20 This is Guile 2.0.7.112-f5ea5. The behavior of the first case makes (compose f g) fail when f takes = less args tan g produces. Regards Daniel