Re: segfault in CVS HEAD

Re: segfault in CVS HEAD

[Bill Schottstaedt]

I also have hit that bug -- next time it happens, I'll
try to track it down.  Have you (Dirk) had a chance to
look at the procedure-source bug mentioned a few weeks
ago (and related to this one, I bet)?  It is a real
problem for me that procedure-source is not a usable
source anymore -- I can't use the CVS Guile.
Here's the original -- I don't know why the mailer
translates "pound at l a m b d a":

----
In Sunday's Guile (6-jun):

guile> (define (hi a) (+ a 1))
guile> (procedure-source hi)
(lambda (a) # @ lambda (+ a 1))

Is this (the new "# @ lambda") an intentional change?
If I call the procedure, the # @ lambda disappears:

guile> (define (hi a) (+ a 1))
guile> (hi 1)
2
guile> (procedure-source hi)
(lambda (a) (+ a 1))
----

Surely debugging junk like this can be put under a
debugging flag and not impact everyone else?



_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: segfault in CVS HEAD

[Dirk Herrmann]

Hi Bill and Han-Wen,

thanks for both your inputs. I have just committed some patches that 
should solve your problems. I would be glad if you could check whether 
it now works for you.

Best regards,
Dirk



_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile