* Need to include autoconf.texi into Ref Manual guile.texi
@ 2007-08-09 17:16 Mike Gran
2007-08-10 7:58 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Gran @ 2007-08-09 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bug Guile
Hi-
It appears that there is no @include in the reference manual guile.texi
for the section autoconf.texi for the 1.8.x branch and the MAIN branch.
I think the autoconf.texi info is still relevant, right?
Thanks,
Mike Gran
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Need to include autoconf.texi into Ref Manual guile.texi
2007-08-09 17:16 Need to include autoconf.texi into Ref Manual guile.texi Mike Gran
@ 2007-08-10 7:58 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-08-17 19:38 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2007-08-10 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bug-guile
Hi,
Mike Gran <spk121@yahoo.com> writes:
> It appears that there is no @include in the reference manual guile.texi
> for the section autoconf.texi for the 1.8.x branch and the MAIN branch.
Indeed. The ChangeLog doesn't explicitly mention its removal, so it
might be accidental.
> I think the autoconf.texi info is still relevant, right?
Well, sort of. I'm not sure we should still advertise `GUILE_SITE_DIR'
because using it leads to packages that do not honor their `--prefix'
(I've been doing it for some time...). As for the `autofrisk' stuff,
I'm not sure it's really that useful, and it's certainly not very well
maintained, so perhaps we shouldn't advertise it either (`frisk' is
nice, though).
I'd like to know what others think.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Need to include autoconf.texi into Ref Manual guile.texi
2007-08-10 7:58 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2007-08-17 19:38 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen @ 2007-08-17 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: bug-guile
() ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:58:49 +0200
I'd like to know what others think.
i think by end of 2007 we should aim to merge guile 1.4.x niceties
(including autofrisk and other reflective and otherwise things) into
guile HEAD, assuming there is some aligned interest. the auto* tools
interop and documentation[1] is one of the areas that would benefit.
sooner is better, since next guile 1.4.x will be released under GPLv3 or
later (note: NOT *L*GPL), at which point merging from 1.4.x to HEAD can
be drearily complicated for HEAD maintainers (although the reverse, from
HEAD to 1.4.x, won't pose any problems for me).
thi
[1]
http://www.gnuvola.org/software/guile/doc/Using-Autoconf-Macros.html
http://www.gnuvola.org/software/guile/doc/index.html
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-17 19:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-09 17:16 Need to include autoconf.texi into Ref Manual guile.texi Mike Gran
2007-08-10 7:58 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-08-17 19:38 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).