From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Maxime Devos Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#46220: Fwd: Some non-standard O_* flags are missing Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:30:22 +0100 Message-ID: <308932c261a6f953a498606fb45cb35e08988af5.camel@telenet.be> References: Reply-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SMQRFi0BQvz8SOY4HZEC" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="807"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 To: 46220@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 31 22:31:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6KJH-000077-Hl for guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:31:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42424 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6KJG-0000Ir-C5 for guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:31:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6KJC-0000IQ-3K for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6KJB-00034g-R1 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:31:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6KJB-0006tf-Nu for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:31:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Maxime Devos Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 21:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 46220 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161212864326485 (code B ref -1); Sun, 31 Jan 2021 21:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2021 21:30:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58211 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6KIs-0006t6-Dm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:30:43 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36338) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6KIq-0006sy-6T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:30:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6KIp-0000BS-Lg for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:30:39 -0500 Original-Received: from laurent.telenet-ops.be ([2a02:1800:110:4::f00:19]:48332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6KIn-0002nh-CR for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:30:39 -0500 Original-Received: from ptr-bvsjgyjmffd7q9timvx.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:aaf1:9810:a0b8:a55d]) by laurent.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id PZWY2400Z0mfAB401ZWZwZ; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:30:33 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21; t=1612128633; bh=8x5zR5xX3adGcyUcQSK8UqG4S8OTEx7G8KbK8SDeHVk=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:References; b=O/lh/8HtGAxjfBPtyGNwLyjU/4RFwC1urhcgU7nvukUDXvhrfIyO65Q0/7YbAXPVE VQ48SmUQdWohJwXxbBxos4mjkZt2xKg0/O9zv64t3kFkrOS6v6AQZNQ9reoUe+jPkf vesYDlHufrmSn27s9acl2AURmnKFhQCspwt8cPp2YVCW4MsH4PiwO4r89aGKwan5ZN nyVN8Mdf3bIvfT0k4ZqzVuiNN4quv1EqpXOg7uIGatstrGfj10NvctoUT+P/JMDm51 qnmeckXbXvpGn8c0BxJC24w1u6l8g8SSOhZGxYg9KDQqZJFzKZ/I+VxAay6FNYKfcg oWUUDdNJD/87Q== Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:110:4::f00:19; envelope-from=maximedevos@telenet.be; helo=laurent.telenet-ops.be X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:9971 Archived-At: --=-SMQRFi0BQvz8SOY4HZEC Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-QMAryqVwkd0hxTdqd8b3" --=-QMAryqVwkd0hxTdqd8b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi guilers, I've accidentally sent the message to guile-devel instead of bug-guile. The bug report is forwarded here. --=-QMAryqVwkd0hxTdqd8b3 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: Forwarded message =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=94?= Some non-standard O_* flags are missing Content-Type: message/rfc822 Message-ID: Subject: Some non-standard O_* flags are missing From: Maxime Devos To: guile-devel@gnu.org Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:13:10 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OhU4SSQAETJrTbPGgv8v" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 --=-OhU4SSQAETJrTbPGgv8v Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi guilers, I noticed the following open flags are not defined: O_NOFOLLOW, O_TMPFILE, O_IGNORE_CTTY, O_NOLINK, O_SHLOCK, O_EXLOCK, O_ASYNC, O_NOATIME. Some of these are Hurd-specific, Linux-specific and BSD-specific. I'm particularily interested in O_NOFOLLOW, O_TMPFILE, O_IGNORE_CTTY, O_NOLINK and O_NOATIME, the others don't matter for me, though they may be useful for others. Could extra O_* flags be exported to Guile (in libguile/filesys.c) on systems where they are defined? Greetings, Maxime --=20 Maxime Devos PGP Key: C1F3 3EE2 0C52 8FDB 7DD7 011F 49E3 EE22 1917 25EE Freenode handle: mdevos --=-OhU4SSQAETJrTbPGgv8v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYIADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYBcdZhccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7j8zAQCUR1roSnNX+QkjDkWTu3cfRblc lz7tecpIhsZEm2w+BwD+KB1oyjmtqzrZAfFdGm9ywrWvK09Owuw0BGuXGSfkKg0= =BVzM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-OhU4SSQAETJrTbPGgv8v-- --=-QMAryqVwkd0hxTdqd8b3-- --=-SMQRFi0BQvz8SOY4HZEC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYIADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYBchbhccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7hXDAP91T6H5/F6f8YKE0cU94lAVwwWZ UHdkHjLeFjPDDF0krQEAxdzjOdFBcncayrCv8utJz0QZxkKHzGQ1k6FtRNla1wk= =JWSb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SMQRFi0BQvz8SOY4HZEC--