From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Aberg Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328087998 28928 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2012 09:19:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 10:19:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWM6-0006sv-Or for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:19:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55349 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWM6-00023y-1G for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:19:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59833) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWM0-00023q-0n for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:19:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWLu-0003fk-FM for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:19:47 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44567) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWLu-0003fe-Dr for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:19:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWME-0008CU-Gt for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132808796931479 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 09:19:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWLg-0008Bf-Af for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:19:29 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out11.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.200]:58602) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWLc-0008BS-Th for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:19:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out11.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC3D3500C06BD4; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:18:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6139 Archived-At: On 1 Feb 2012, at 02:49, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> After doing this, the same failure with the LLVM-GCC compiler: >> /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 >> /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 >> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 >>=20 >> This is the compiler that one will use on OS X 10.7 if one installs >> Xcode 4.2.1, and is not setting the compiler explicitly (or = overriding >> by another install). >>=20 >> Hans >>=20 >>=20 >> PASS: test-asmobs >> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >> FAIL: test-ffi >=20 > Are you sure this guile was linked against your newly-built 'libffi'? Yes, I compiled it with llvm-gcc, and installed it. All new compiles = were made out of the source directory. > Your previously reported results (using GCC 4.7.0 from SVN) seemed to > suggest a bug in an earlier version of 'libffi' that has since been > fixed in their development tree. It suggests that problem is with llvm-gcc (an clang), I think. With = gcc-4.7 there is no libffi failure. Hans