Hello Andy,
Ludovic,
Mark,

> >> So I guess we should revert 83d4c4d622b406ec0bc9d8139ec8182fa72b5720 and
> >> release 2.2.4 afterwards.  Does that make sense, Andy?  

I hope (one of) you will find some time to look at 

	bug#29669: repl-print - requet for improvement
	bug#29684: exception printers - request for improvement

so a solution could be part of 2.2.4

Thanls,
David