From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Samuel Thibault Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#26675: guile-2.2.0 in GNU/Hurd Followup-To: gmane.os.hurd.bugs Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 21:25:50 +0200 Organization: I am not organized Message-ID: <20170509192550.cu3n6t37mpdpeuwk__20796.3598230437$1494357974$gmane$org@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> References: <87zievrqu1.fsf@pobox.com> <28vJTSJwH2MTrq6LP4gfpE@xwlx5MFLJR/sHJzi8s1Pg> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1494357974 2401 195.159.176.226 (9 May 2017 19:26:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 19:26:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Cc: bug-hurd@gnu.org, 26675@debbugs.gnu.org, manolis837@gmail.com To: rennes Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 09 21:26:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Alt-0000Uk-Dy for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 21:26:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39029 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Alz-0002v9-15 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 15:26:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50449) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Aln-0002s3-VG for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 15:26:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Alm-000594-Rx for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 15:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60067) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Alm-00058t-Oj for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 15:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Alm-0003d2-G2 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 15:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Samuel Thibault Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 19:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26675 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26675-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26675.149435795613935 (code B ref 26675); Tue, 09 May 2017 19:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26675) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 May 2017 19:25:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34511 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Alf-0003ch-QW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 15:25:56 -0400 Original-Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:51135) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Ale-0003cY-DZ for 26675@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 15:25:54 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E27011B; Tue, 9 May 2017 21:25:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Original-Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NByD5NBRY-nh; Tue, 9 May 2017 21:25:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr (unknown [IPv6:2a01:cb19:181:c200:3602:86ff:fe2c:6a19]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48CBBB2; Tue, 9 May 2017 21:25:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from samy by var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Ala-0006r9-Jz; Tue, 09 May 2017 21:25:50 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: rennes , bug-hurd@gnu.org, Andy Wingo , 26675@debbugs.gnu.org, manolis837@gmail.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <28vJTSJwH2MTrq6LP4gfpE@xwlx5MFLJR/sHJzi8s1Pg> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8801 Archived-At: Hello, rennes, on mar. 09 mai 2017 08:32:21 -0500, wrote: > I forwarded the mail about the guile-2.2 bug in Hurd; Andy a guile developer > comments on the error as follows: > > "'Setrlimit' is incapable of limiting your memory usage." Indeed, I think it's not implemented yet. > I understand that Hurd is an OS that is under development/experimental and > has not yet implemented functions/features as mentioned. > Given this situation, can we do something about it? Well, either implement it :) or skip the test, I guess. Samuel > On 05/02/2017 02:39:18 PM, Andy Wingo wrote: > > On Thu 27 Apr 2017 04:35, rennes writes: > > > > > We are testing guile-2.2.0 in GNU/Hurd, we have passed the build phase > > > setting "--disable-largefile" parameter to configure script. > > > On the other hand in the check phase, get the error: > > > > > > wrote > > > `/tmp/guix-build-guile-2.2.0.drv-0/guile-2.2.0/cache/guile/ccache/2.2-LE-4-3.9/tmp/guix-build-guile-2.2.0.drv-0/guile-2.2.0/test-suite/standalone/test-out-of-memory.go' > > > Backtrace: > > > 7 (apply-smob/1 #) > > > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > > > 710:2 6 (call-with-prompt _ _ # > default-prompt-handle?>) > > > In ice-9/eval.scm: > > > 619:8 5 (_ #(#(#))) > > > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > > > 2309:4 4 (save-module-excursion _) > > > 3816:12 3 (_) > > > In ./test-out-of-memory: > > > 53:0 2 (_) > > > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > > > 834:9 1 (catch _ _ # > > > ?) > > > In unknown file: > > > 0 (scm-error misc-error #f "~A" ("should not be reached") > > #) > > > > > > ERROR: In procedure scm-error: > > > ERROR: should not be reached > > > FAIL: test-out-of-memory > > > > This means that your "setrlimit" is incapable of limiting your memory > > usage. A Hurd bug? > > > > Andy > -- Samuel #include