From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Zefram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#26164: time-difference mishandles leap seconds Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:22:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20170419162203.GE6765@fysh.org> References: <20170318224126.GK6518@fysh.org> <87d1c8mprz.fsf@igalia.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492619000 6693 195.159.176.226 (19 Apr 2017 16:23:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:23:20 +0000 (UTC) To: 26164@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 19 18:23:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sNv-0001bS-1i for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:23:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49319 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sO0-0000M9-TA for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:23:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46652) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sNo-0000KS-9S for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:23:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sNi-0005b6-Os for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58999) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sNi-0005au-Hg for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sNi-0004h8-9v for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Zefram Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26164 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26164-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26164.149261892817951 (code B ref 26164); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26164) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Apr 2017 16:22:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57195 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sMq-0004fT-9O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:22:08 -0400 Original-Received: from river.fysh.org ([87.98.248.19]:54157 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sMo-0004fL-NO for 26164@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:22:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fysh.org; s=20170316; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=ZjkJ0wtPP5RjEoTTrfG2S+NQlBKtFsKJYZKUfcc3PJE=; b=M79i4kUWtMTxi40ku90mh5pCfBAVu7i2PArS+WCxLwXaqGZ073kFLEiQAGlygCbPIwgtdm6jmus/42XBMEDA+Ctv2m2Jo0L5Zk7o/uolXIej8YldZya80KmzC3pEVQyhQ0hePbMTuPbQ1FRxqQydbZPF6xwk9iZjHDkOj9iNWyA=; Original-Received: from zefram by river.fysh.org with local (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1d0sMl-0005Rw-Ra; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:22:03 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d1c8mprz.fsf@igalia.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8763 Archived-At: Andy Wingo wrote: >Makes sense to me. Would you like to submit a patch and test case? This particular bug has interactions with other bugs that make me uncomfortable about attempting to fix it right now. The right way to fix this is especially influenced by the approach taken to bug#22033 and to the bug regarding pre-1972 UTC. The latter I haven't even reported yet because it's difficult to formulate in the presence of some of the other UTC-related bugs such as bug#21911 and bug#21912. So I think this is one to postpone until some of those are out of the way. -zefram