From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Braun Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#25463: guile-2.0.13 Check errors Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:47:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20170213094751.GA29250__42599.3470977575$1487003183$gmane$org@shattrath> References: <4f693f6528e76a93e17e73450e2bc320@openmailbox.org> <87vasg1luf.fsf@gnu.org> <6f657e5c558f7594b14d50dea55f79bd@openmailbox.org> <87vasfqfat.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487003183 8239 195.159.176.226 (13 Feb 2017 16:26:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:26:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, rennes@openmailbox.org, Manolis Ragkousis , 25463@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 13 17:26:17 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdJSC-0001eo-49 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:26:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57929 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdJSH-0002vV-Op for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:26:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40652) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdJS3-0002tu-KD for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdJRz-0004pR-Bj for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:26:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40573) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdJRz-0004pJ-92 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdJRz-000460-4M for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:26:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Braun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:26:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25463 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25463-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25463.148700314915710 (code B ref 25463); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:26:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25463) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2017 16:25:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38770 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdJRl-00045K-3r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:25:49 -0500 Original-Received: from shattrath.sceen.net ([151.80.19.218]:47698 helo=mail.sceen.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdDEe-0001TG-R8 for 25463@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 04:47:53 -0500 Original-Received: by mail.sceen.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9819A4E61A; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:47:51 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vasfqfat.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:25:47 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8543 Archived-At: On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:18:02PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Manolis Ragkousis skribis: > > > Locally on Hurd I am using this patch > > http://paste.lisp.org/display/338954 on the glibc/hurd package to work > > around that test failure. Ideally we need to modify the way guile > > handles time.[1] > > Does ‘glibc/hurd’ have this patch in ‘core-updates’? Should it? > > Would it make sense to address this issue in Guile instead of libc, > Richard? I guess the answer depends on how many programs make this > assumption besides Guile. I'd say applications shouldn't be concerned with that, this problem should remain solved by the system components, and libc (or procfs or whatever) are the right places to deal with it. See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2013-06/msg00089.html. -- Richard Braun