From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: aszlig Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#18945: Parallel compilation with jobs >= 12 fails on DOT_I_FILES Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:12:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20160622131217.GN18891@estale.redmoonstudios.org> References: <20141104105020.GH32678@estale.redmoonstudios.org> <87lh1xtqce.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M2Pxvdb9QxnGd/3e" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466602408 17355 80.91.229.3 (22 Jun 2016 13:33:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18945@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 22 15:33:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bFiGY-0007Fx-Tm for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:32:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58375 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFiGY-00026z-5S for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:32:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFhxq-00075I-6X for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFhxl-0004LB-Rl for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:13:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFhxl-0004L5-OH for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:13:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bFhxl-0007O8-Kp for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:13:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: aszlig Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18945 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18945-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18945.146660114128353 (code B ref 18945); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18945) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2016 13:12:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50432 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bFhx7-0007NF-21 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:12:21 -0400 Original-Received: from redmoonstudios.org ([213.133.97.59]:50038 helo=estale.redmoonstudios.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bFhx5-0007N6-CO for 18945@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:12:19 -0400 Original-Received: by estale.redmoonstudios.org (AvianCarrier, from userid 1000) id 96FBC60003E1; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:12:17 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lh1xtqce.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8124 Archived-At: --M2Pxvdb9QxnGd/3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:28:33PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote: > How would this work? The .deps includes a dependency e.g. of > libguile_2.0_la-instructions.lo on vm-i-system.i. That should be > sufficient, no? Is it not guaranteed that .deps are there or > something? I have no idea, because I have reported that bug in 2014 and things might have changed in-between in addition to me forgetting about the specifics of this bug. So I guess this bug can be closed and I'll reopen a new bug if it happens again. a! --=20 aszlig Universal dilettante --M2Pxvdb9QxnGd/3e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAldqjrEACgkQ0OvQ7IwtyWHc+gD/Wd7tIJjV1QuCkg4LOPivGR5+ ipRvdU2z4+MOYpwjCrUA/j9x/OHtPDwc5p3ZJs7oRYT78s1HODDs/kiTgTRelVsM =TMQB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M2Pxvdb9QxnGd/3e--