From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#23739: Unexpected behavior of 'add-to-load-path'. Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:41:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20160610134143.GA8848@tuxteam.de> References: <878tydck6k.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465566159 25073 80.91.229.3 (10 Jun 2016 13:42:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23739@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mathieu Lirzin Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 10 15:42:28 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bBMhV-0002AV-Uj for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:42:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41198 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBMhV-000677-9a for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:42:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33033) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBMhN-000668-AJ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:42:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBMhG-0002HW-4Y for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:42:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBMhG-0002HR-0s for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bBMhF-0000X9-Mj for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:42:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23739 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23739-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23739.14655661102034 (code B ref 23739); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23739) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2016 13:41:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35241 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bBMh4-0000Wk-0f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:41:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:46539 helo=tomasium.tuxteam.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bBMh2-0000Wb-Rv for 23739@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:41:49 -0400 Original-Received: from tomas by tomasium.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1bBMgx-0002OM-T9; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:41:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878tydck6k.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8018 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:17:23PM +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > Hello, > > I have noticed something that doesn't feel right when using > ‘add-to-load-path’. > > $ cat test.scm > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (define old %load-path) > (add-to-load-path "foo") > (pk %load-path) > (pk old) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > first run: > > $ guile test.scm > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > ;;; [Compilation] > ;;; (("foo" "foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) > > ;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > next runs: > > $ guile test.scm > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > ;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) > > ;;; (("/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I can confirm half of it :-) I mean: the double entry "foo" for %load-path in your first result above doesn't happen for me. Could that be a typo? As for the strangely different behaviour when running pre-compiled (old has %load-path's old value) and compiling (old has %load-path's value after (add-to-load-path ...) yes, that happens to me too, on tomas@rasputin:/tmp$ guile --version guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.11.133-d680 Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Looks like a bug to me. regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAldaw5cACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZmoACfd8HliwAbrWdo3xK1jm44aIkQ yPYAnj9MoF0OanAUD46iOnAoLLA1qrVu =zuV2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----