From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#18592: FFI should have portable access to =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98errno=E2=80=99?= Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 21:32:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20160303203241.GC5413@tuxteam.de> References: <20160105074924.GA23165@tuxteam.de> <1451983123.3594.156.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <87vb78jc86.fsf@netris.org> <1452021701.3594.160.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <1455783943.3838.16.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <871t8af8no.fsf@netris.org> <1455858156.3838.21.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <1456485534.7330.63.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <87si07sbu8.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457039304 26375 80.91.229.3 (3 Mar 2016 21:08:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 21:08:24 +0000 (UTC) To: 18592@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 03 22:08:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1abaTk-0008Bl-FE for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:08:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37378 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abaTj-0001sh-8X for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:08:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50023) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abaTf-0001ri-RE for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:08:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abaTa-0004pJ-QR for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:08:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abaTa-0004pF-Mz for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abaTa-0002Jg-Gt for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 21:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18592 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14570392568873 (code B ref -1); Thu, 03 Mar 2016 21:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2016 21:07:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60547 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abaTA-0002J3-ER for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:07:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abaT9-0002Is-Gk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:07:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abaT3-0004k7-AK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:07:30 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:44674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abaT3-0004k3-7J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:07:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abaT2-0001oo-BM for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:07:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abaSx-0004jc-BB for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:07:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:46054 helo=tomasium.tuxteam.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abaSx-0004jX-5a for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:07:23 -0500 Original-Received: from tomas by tomasium.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1abZvN-0001kw-Vl for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 21:32:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87si07sbu8.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:7974 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:36:15PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Nala Ginrut writes: > > > Is there still problem? I'm fine with the patch, and I'm expecting to > > merge it ASAP. Anyway, please don't hesitate to tell me if there's still > > any problem, I'm glad to help to do it better. I really need it. > > Sorry for the delay, but I'm having second thoughts about whether this > is the right approach. Perhaps we should instead make a set of > commitments that certain basic operations like scheme evaluation, heap > allocation, and basic scheme procedures will leave 'errno' unchanged. A shout from the peanut gallery (again ;) but this sounds scary. Of course, clobbering errno by things out of the user's control sounds scary too. Nala's interface feels to me more... right. regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlbYn2kACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbhiwCfXq45vAYA5LVcWIcIvyQ1+GKF ZdwAn2QJVVDz/OoS/NUJ7y6R+GCwdxnc =xFmg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----