From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chris Vine Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#17661: Some guile-2.0 asyncs functions do not link correctly Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 17:54:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20140601175448.00cbf158@bother.homenet> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401647615 30195 80.91.229.3 (1 Jun 2014 18:33:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 18:33:35 +0000 (UTC) To: 17661@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 01 20:33:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WrAZS-0003zf-49 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 20:33:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41718 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrAZR-0002k3-N1 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 14:33:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40939) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr9Ll-0002Zz-QU for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 13:15:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr9Lb-0000h3-V0 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 13:15:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr9Lb-0000gn-R9 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 13:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr9Lb-0004gO-51 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 13:15:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chris Vine Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 17:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 17661 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.140164287017917 (code B ref -1); Sun, 01 Jun 2014 17:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2014 17:14:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40037 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr9L3-0004eo-7P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 13:14:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35392) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr92X-00042Q-Co for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 12:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr92I-0006PH-0n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 12:55:15 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr92H-0006P7-V3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 12:55:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr92A-0004YC-DZ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 12:55:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr922-0006Fo-Tv for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 12:54:58 -0400 Original-Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42]:45671 helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr922-0006Fk-OJ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 12:54:50 -0400 Original-Received: from bother.homenet ([95.146.111.162]) by mwinf5d17 with ME id 94uo1o00C3WGlpK034uoga; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 18:54:48 +0200 X-ME-Helo: bother.homenet X-ME-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 18:54:48 +0200 X-ME-IP: 95.146.111.162 Original-Received: from bother.homenet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bother.homenet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404A08A213 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 17:54:48 +0100 (BST) X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.23; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 13:14:27 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 14:33:22 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:7470 Archived-At: guile-2.0's scm_c_call_with_blocked_asyncs, scm_c_call_with_unblocked_asyncs, scm_dynwind_block_asyncs and scm_dynwind_unblock_asyncs will not link for me using 32-bit ubuntu-14.04 (gcc-4.8.2/guile-2.0.9) or 32-bit slackware-14.1 (gcc-4.9.0/guile-2.0.11). I do not have a machine to test a 64-bit system at present. The issue appears to be that this part of the API is not exported, even though these functions are documented and appear intended to be called by user code. A patch, against guile-2.0.11, is below, dealing with this. --- guile-2.0.11/libguile/async.h.orig 2014-05-04 10:38:14.631777784 +0100 +++ guile-2.0.11/libguile/async.h 2014-05-04 10:45:45.615763664 +0100 @@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ SCM_API SCM scm_noop (SCM args); SCM_API SCM scm_call_with_blocked_asyncs (SCM proc); SCM_API SCM scm_call_with_unblocked_asyncs (SCM proc); -void *scm_c_call_with_blocked_asyncs (void *(*p) (void *d), void *d); -void *scm_c_call_with_unblocked_asyncs (void *(*p) (void *d), void *d); -void scm_dynwind_block_asyncs (void); -void scm_dynwind_unblock_asyncs (void); +SCM_API void *scm_c_call_with_blocked_asyncs (void *(*p) (void *d), void *d); +SCM_API void *scm_c_call_with_unblocked_asyncs (void *(*p) (void *d), void *d); +SCM_API void scm_dynwind_block_asyncs (void); +SCM_API void scm_dynwind_unblock_asyncs (void); /* Critical sections */