From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Bex Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#11887: string->number edge cases Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 20:06:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20130305190633.GI4379@frohike.xs4all.nl> References: <87sjd1qfs3.fsf@Kagami.home> <87txopyk9i.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362528516 17658 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2013 00:08:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 00:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ian Price , 11887@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 06 01:09:00 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UD1ul-0008CZ-MD for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 01:08:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52597 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UD1uQ-0004ee-1D for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:08:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39407) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCxRi-0004ZL-ED for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:22:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCxRg-00048p-Dg for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:22:42 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57056) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCxRg-00048l-As for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:22:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCxS1-0001HK-Ld for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:23:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Peter Bex Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11887 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11887-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11887.13625113714892 (code B ref 11887); Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11887) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2013 19:22:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32930 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCxRq-0001Gq-Ub for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:22:51 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.26]:1955) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCxDb-0000ud-TN for 11887@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:08:09 -0500 Original-Received: from frohike.xs4all.nl (frohike.xs4all.nl [80.101.127.174]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r25J7deD035963; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 20:07:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Peter.Bex@xs4all.nl) Original-Received: by frohike.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02F24F7E007; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 20:06:34 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87txopyk9i.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:22:49 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:08:35 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6856 Archived-At: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:49:13PM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On Mon 09 Jul 2012 14:29, Ian Price writes: > > > PARSE ERROR ("+InF.0" +inf.0 "+inf.0" "+Inf.0") => #f > > PARSE ERROR ("-iNF.0" -inf.0 "-inf.0" "-Inf.0") => #f > > PARSE ERROR ("+NAN.0" +nan.0 "+nan.0" "+NaN.0") => #f > > These are not errors. +NAN.0 is not even not a number :) I double-checked, but in the upcoming R7RS it is (see 7.1, paragraph 2 of draft 7). It looks like R6RS was case-sensitive in its numerical syntax and +NAN.0 is disallowed by it. Cheers, Peter -- http://www.more-magic.net