From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Pirotte Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10567: Fw: guile-library - make bug report Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 14:29:43 -0200 Message-ID: <20120204142943.21e0ba23@rascar> References: <20120120162545.7e92155d@altosw.be> <87sjirj554.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328373030 8259 80.91.229.3 (4 Feb 2012 16:30:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 16:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10567@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 04 17:30:28 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RtiVQ-0005qC-6M for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:30:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38658 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtiVP-0006sy-II for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:30:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58037) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtiVM-0006ss-8G for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:30:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtiVL-0001dh-45 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:30:24 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtiVL-0001dX-2V for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:30:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtiVx-0003dI-St for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:31:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: David Pirotte Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10567 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10567-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10567.132837305313947 (code B ref 10567); Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10567) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2012 16:30:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54433 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtiVp-0003cu-05 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:30:53 -0500 Original-Received: from maximusconfessor.all2all.org ([62.58.108.13]:41966) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtiVj-0003cj-Kw for 10567@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:30:51 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.0.2]) by maximusconfessor.all2all.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2CFA04C1AA; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 17:30:07 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from maximusconfessor.all2all.org ([192.168.0.1]) by localhost (maximusconfessor.all2all.org [192.168.0.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 725Ahyb56tI7; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 17:07:15 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from rascar (unknown [177.30.115.118]) by maximusconfessor.all2all.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3001CA04C1B0; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 17:29:58 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87sjirj554.fsf@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6196 Archived-At: Hi Andy, > The line in question: > > (eq? (car rest) ':) > > It seems you have (read-set! keywords 'prefix) in your init.scm, which > affects the compile-time environment. Yes I do, sorry i din't think of that but i confirm it is the case. ... Cheers, David Aside, I always did actually [read-set! ...], and questioned myself, as an 'old lisper', why scheme does requirer, per defaut, that we enter 2 chars instead of one, what ever i would be, to tell guile/scheme it's dealing with a keyword ?