From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10336: Holidays vs. release Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:40:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20120126044019.EVVQZ.108994.root@cdptpa-web12-z01> References: <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327552905 30932 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2012 04:41:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10336@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Andy Wingo Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 05:41:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqH9V-0004Xj-T2 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:41:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46343 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqH9V-0006qz-4i for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:41:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqH9S-0006qk-Lk for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:41:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqH9R-000671-LF for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:41:34 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqH9R-00066q-8q for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:41:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqH9u-0004Hz-Bq for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10336 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10336-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10336.132755286916426 (code B ref 10336); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10336) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2012 04:41:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqH8v-0004Gj-T2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:41:08 -0500 Original-Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:8774) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqH8o-0004GB-Je for 10336@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:41:00 -0500 Authentication-Results: cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com smtp.user=dsmich@roadrunner.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=ad3jbGUt c=1 sm=0 a=UIyOkF2rswIA:10 a=zTVDa7HKqxcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ybZZDoGAAAAA:8 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=rk5CBB1YCikIIzHXNi0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=qIVjreYYsbEA:10 a=ii61gXl28gQA:10 a=O8Q5qNTgwofbtOQ0FzitMg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Original-Received: from [10.127.132.103] ([10.127.132.103:45706] helo=cdptpa-web12-z01) by cdptpa-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTPA id E3/EC-01110-239D02F4; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:40:19 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87aa5bbqrc.fsf@pobox.com> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal X-Originating-IP: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6085 Archived-At: ---- Andy Wingo wrote:=20 > Hi Ludovic, >=20 > I pushed a couple patches that should help this bug out, though for some > reason I wasn't able to reproduce the issue before. I wonder why. >=20 > On Wed 25 Jan 2012 17:10, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >=20 > > So I looked into it, and there=E2=80=99s at least one thing wrong: the = test must > > be compiled with #:partial-eval? #f, otherwise the =E2=80=98let=E2=80= =99 vanishes, which > > defeats the test. >=20 > Indeed. I think I fixed that now. >=20 > > Second thing, it suffices to insert a function call like > > ((lambda (x) #f) #f) just before calls to =E2=80=98gc=E2=80=99 to solve= the problem. >=20 > Strange. Another thing was that the function was a constant, not a > closure, so it wasn't going to be collectable in the first place. >=20 > Can you retry the test now, Dale? Sure. v2.0.3-190-gf5e772b still has the same failure. -Dale