From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Petr Gajdos Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10096: Failing gc.test for i586 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:41:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20111124074141.GA31854@laura.suse.cz> References: <20111121144653.GA22864@laura.suse.cz> <87d3cjniv6.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322120563 32081 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2011 07:42:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10096@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 24 08:42:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTTx8-0000IJ-TZ for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:42:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53530 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTTx7-0002fd-Vd for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:42:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46444) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTTx4-0002fS-Ao for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:42:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTTx2-0006PR-Ny for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:42:34 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTTx2-0006PK-K6 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:42:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTTyT-0005rJ-QG for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:44:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Petr Gajdos Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10096 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10096-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10096.132212061022475 (code B ref 10096); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10096) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2011 07:43:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTTxw-0005qN-8g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:43:29 -0500 Original-Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15] helo=mx2.suse.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTTxs-0005qC-9p for 10096@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:43:25 -0500 Original-Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49A68CC2B; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:41:53 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d3cjniv6.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:44:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5941 Archived-At: --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 01:06:21PM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote: > On Mon 21 Nov 2011 15:46, Petr Gajdos writes: >=20 > > gc.test is failing with guile 2.0.3 for me on i586: > > FAIL: gc.test: gc: Unused modules are removed > > > > I don't observe this for guile 2.0.2. Could you please=20 > > guide me to resolve this issue? >=20 > Hummmm. Well, on the one side, it is not really a fatal failure. This > tests allocates 1000 modules, then does a few gc runs, then checks to > make sure they were all collected. Since libgc is a conservative > collector, it is possible that it mistakenly thinks one of those modules > is still alive -- a problem that is more acute on 32-bit systems. It is > also dependent on the compiler you use, the version of libgc, etc. >=20 > I think if I were you, I would just ignore this error. I know it's not > a very good answer, but does that work for you? Andy,=20 thanks a lot for you answer, I will ignore it. Best regards, Petr --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7N9TUACgkQGevYtT2kPwNgfgCfZ0SNY6fGyfSf2f+wFBqtNR9w L3gAn3BAEAFP6lPWbt4gdOh4pJJb1FV3 =ILu9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--