From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Pirotte Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: module system / (oop goops) / :duplicates (merge-generics) / bug? Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:41:41 -0300 Message-ID: <20110906124141.5d969d73@rascar> References: <20110705183229.6f779a6b@rascar> <87vcvfcrjc.fsf@gnu.org> <20110706162244.2bf4b90a@rascar> <87ipre48zj.fsf@pobox.com> <20110707132659.2cee382d@rascar> <87box54xjg.fsf@pobox.com> <20110708140559.6ed55cd9@rascar> <87tyav3h7q.fsf@pobox.com> <20110709120816.0827236b@rascar> <87aack3jif.fsf@pobox.com> <20110711222555.4bd45679@rascar> <87bovngf01.fsf@pobox.com> <20110819024043.74a4d71e@rascar> <20110829140518.4ad0c46a@rascar> <87ehzz423n.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315324519 30085 80.91.229.12 (6 Sep 2011 15:55:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?= To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 06 17:55:12 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R0xzO-0004WC-Tk for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:55:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48720 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R0xmh-0007HK-6L for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:41:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R0xme-0007HD-3u for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:41:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R0xmd-0004Uw-4W for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:41:56 -0400 Original-Received: from maximusconfessor.all2all.org ([62.58.108.13]:34926) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R0xmd-0004Uk-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:41:55 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.0.2]) by maximusconfessor.all2all.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5891A04C415; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:41:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from maximusconfessor.all2all.org ([192.168.0.1]) by localhost (maximusconfessor.all2all.org [192.168.0.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id geZro6mzCKJZ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:22:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from rascar (unknown [139.82.89.70]) by maximusconfessor.all2all.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F99CA04C1CC; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:41:43 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87ehzz423n.fsf@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.4; i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 62.58.108.13 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5812 Archived-At: Hi Andy, > ... Well. This was indeed an amusing issue :) > I am indeed sitting in the caf=C3=A9, and so thank you :) However right = now > I trust Guile more than I trust Guile-GNOME, so an more minimal > case is even better :) Like this: Yes, of course: it took me a while to understand what could be the cause of= the bug, and all attempts until reaching the sample I sent, were made upon these sma= ll gtk pieces of code. Then I thought, too late, that I should have tried also usi= ng guile only before to send ... > a.scm: > ... Thanks for the example, understood, i'll do my best in the future. I realiz= e I should also learn not to write example code that depends on what is in my i= nit.scm [such as (read-set! keywords 'prefix), (ice-9 format) ...]. > ... I believe that I have fixed it in Guile. Many thanks. I believe it is fixed too. > Thanks for the report, Welcome, Cheers, David