From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: =?utf-8?b?UmU6IEZhaWx1cmVzIGluIOKAmHRocmVhZHMudGVzdOKAmQ==?= Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:27:02 -0400 Message-ID: <20110330012702.1D122.98586.root@cdptpa-web05-z02> References: <87zkoda9af.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301448488 8827 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2011 01:28:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:28:08 +0000 (UTC) To: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= , bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 30 03:27:57 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4kCS-0007i7-IT for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 03:27:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4kBi-0003ZF-69 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33039 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4kBc-0003Z6-6b for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4kBb-00054i-0X for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:61885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4kBa-00054T-UD for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:27:02 -0400 Authentication-Results: cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com smtp.user=dsmich@roadrunner.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Nm3SJc7L3wlcojC9snsyzORkYWw1JOu3BeZkTeIwPUk= c=1 sm=0 a=HEynkgf4aYIA:10 a=jPJDawAOAc8A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=doupyKFmAAAA:8 a=aJrebxk0Uwr-qu2rQE8A:9 a=YPSNLvR4phSS2XWlplO7bHBXnJYA:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ii61gXl28gQA:10 a=0vUscowIxtUA:10 a=c4uuQ4XTxkd9Om0nF6JIcA==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Original-Received: from [10.127.132.156] ([10.127.132.156:34909] helo=cdptpa-web05-z02) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTPA id 82/3A-11439-6E6829D4; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:27:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87zkoda9af.fsf@gnu.org> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal X-Originating-IP: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 75.180.132.120 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5384 Archived-At: ---- "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s" wrote:=20 > Hi Dale, Greetings. Thanks for taking a look. And for adding a Subject: (oops!) > An easy answer, but there=E2=80=99s some truth in it: >=20 > writes: >=20 > > With guile at v2.0.0-134-g38c50a9, I'm getting a couple of failures in = threads.test on my single core Debian Squeeze machine: > > > > FAIL: threads.test: lock-mutex: timed locking succeeds if mutex unlocke= d within timeout >=20 > This one may be sensitive to load. Can you try changing > (+ (current-time) 2) to (+ (current-time) 5)? Still failing. Ok I take that back. There was two places with (+ (current= -time) 2). After changing the other one it is *not* failing. diff --git a/test-suite/tests/threads.test b/test-suite/tests/threads.test index 2ffffb5..ba0a2a1 100644 --- a/test-suite/tests/threads.test +++ b/test-suite/tests/threads.test @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ (signal-condition-variable c) (unlock-mutex cm) (lock-mutex m - (+ (current-time) 2))= )))) + (+ (current-time) 5))= )))) (lock-mutex m) (wait-condition-variable c cm) (unlock-mutex cm) > > FAIL: threads.test: mutex-ownership: mutex with owner not retained (bug= #27450) >=20 > This one is GC-sensitive. It=E2=80=99s already kludged at length to impr= ove the > chances of success, but I don=E2=80=99t know how to improve the situation= . It > could throw unresolved instead of failing, but that doesn=E2=80=99t reall= y > help... This message I think I never see when running the test directly. Only with= "make check" do I see it. Yeah, three times in a row with make check, nev= er with ./check-guile threads.test. I'm running 7.2alpha5 libgc. From that tarball I think, not cvs. -Dale