From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bruno Haible Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: <201102222240.02713.bruno@clisp.org> References: <201102191507.50333.bruno@clisp.org> <201102202350.16563.bruno@clisp.org> <878vx7bxw3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298410862 487 80.91.229.12 (22 Feb 2011 21:41:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 22 22:40:57 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Przyb-0004HV-0S for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:40:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48854 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Przya-0006Vj-H3 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:40:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34104 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PrzyN-0006TV-Be for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:40:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PrzyM-00037q-4t for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:40:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.161]:53850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PrzyJ-00035z-VK; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:40:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1298410838; l=361; s=domk; d=haible.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: References:Cc:Date:Subject:To:From:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=LizkclTpzC/+Sb1VwuKKLkEN8ko=; b=YWgz56kUMXxExiFHS9tK7BFahHK/26CmJO8C+O2xbd7aiNHNGXRC5lE/uKe6SEsw0D1 AM+cUDOPln97uPQN481fDR/W0T3icT6a/V3AE9s8UOc9dl5Nk72kxQ9UOgkOXHkiymP1j bO8eR0zT8PSrxLDktXXjb9qitCO1NkJzDXQ= X-RZG-AUTH: :Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brksyK8dozXDwHXjf9hj/zDJRaPAl/HgmxFw= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Original-Received: from linuix.haible.de (dslb-088-069-163-162.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.69.163.162]) by post.strato.de (mrclete mo44) (RZmta 25.5) with ESMTPA id j0749fn1MKl5d5 ; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:40:06 +0100 (MET) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: <878vx7bxw3.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 81.169.146.161 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5223 Archived-At: Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > However, why do you have -Wall in CPPFLAGS, instead of CFLAGS, in the > first place? :-) Because CPPFLAGS=3D-Wall is shorter to type than CFLAGS=3D"-g -O2 -Wall", and I know that -Wall has no effect when linking a program or library. Bruno =2D-=20 In memoriam Sophie Scholl