* [bug #30469] `procedure-source' is broken in Guile 1.9.11
@ 2010-07-18 0:02 Patrick McCarty
[not found] ` <20100719-192229.sv20118.15312@savannah.gnu.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McCarty @ 2010-07-18 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick McCarty, bug-guile
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30469>
Summary: `procedure-source' is broken in Guile 1.9.11
Project: Guile
Submitted by: pnorcks
Submitted on: Sat 17 Jul 2010 05:02:52 PM PDT
Category: None
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: None
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Hello,
I am testing the latest git, and I think I've found a regression (compared to
1.8.7). For a valid procedure definition, Guile returns `#f' for
`procedure-source':
scheme@(guile-user)> (define (test a) (+ a 1))
scheme@(guile-user)> (procedure-source test)
$1 = #f
scheme@(guile-user)>
The same procedure in Guile 1.8.7 returns valid info:
guile> (define (test a) (+ a 1))
guile> (procedure-source test)
(lambda (a) (+ a 1))
guile>
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30469>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread[parent not found: <20100719-192229.sv20118.15312@savannah.gnu.org>]
* [bug #30469] `procedure-source' is broken in Guile 1.9.11 [not found] ` <20100719-192229.sv20118.15312@savannah.gnu.org> @ 2010-07-23 16:46 ` Patrick McCarty 2011-02-13 19:05 ` Andy Wingo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Patrick McCarty @ 2010-07-23 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Wingo, Patrick McCarty, bug-guile Follow-up Comment #2, bug #30469 (project guile): I discovered this while debugging a compile failure with LilyPond... LilyPond's autogenerated documentation of its internal procedures uses `procedure-source' to access the signature of a given procedure. Would you recommend a different solution for this? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30469> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [bug #30469] `procedure-source' is broken in Guile 1.9.11 2010-07-23 16:46 ` Patrick McCarty @ 2011-02-13 19:05 ` Andy Wingo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Andy Wingo @ 2011-02-13 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Wingo, Patrick McCarty, bug-guile Follow-up Comment #3, bug #30469 (project guile): Sorry it took so long to get back to you. Use `procedure-arguments' from (ice-9 session). See its docstring for more details. I'll leave this bug open until we decide to do something else with procedure-source... _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30469> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-13 19:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-18 0:02 [bug #30469] `procedure-source' is broken in Guile 1.9.11 Patrick McCarty
[not found] ` <20100719-192229.sv20118.15312@savannah.gnu.org>
2010-07-23 16:46 ` Patrick McCarty
2011-02-13 19:05 ` Andy Wingo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).