From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: [bug #31445] Incorrect multiple-value truncation [1.9.13] Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:35:27 +0000 Message-ID: <20101118-193526.sv20118.60838@savannah.gnu.org> References: <20101025-095734.sv15145.1814@savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290108946 8483 80.91.229.12 (18 Nov 2010 19:35:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:35:46 +0000 (UTC) To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?= , Andy Wingo , bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 18 20:35:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAGe-0008Vr-Cz for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:35:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47111 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJAGd-0005mk-Fb for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:35:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40486 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJAGY-0005m1-8Y for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:35:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAGX-00017O-20 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:35:29 -0500 Original-Received: from colonialone.fsf.org ([140.186.70.51]:47830 helo=internal.in.savannah.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAGV-00016d-Uy; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:35:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [10.1.0.103] (helo=frontend.in.savannah.gnu.org) by internal.in.savannah.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAGV-00060Q-AP; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:35:27 +0000 Original-Received: from www-data by frontend.in.savannah.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAGV-0000lK-4E; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:35:27 +0000 X-Savane-Server: savannah.gnu.org:443 [10.1.0.103] X-Savane-Project: guile X-Savane-Tracker: bugs X-Savane-Item-ID: 31445 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/531.2+ Epiphany/2.30.2 X-Apparently-From: 88.0.167.219 (Savane authenticated user wingo) In-Reply-To: <20101025-095734.sv15145.1814@savannah.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4868 Archived-At: Follow-up Comment #1, bug #31445 (project guile): This is not a regression, as the results would have been the same before 1.9. But clearly it's not ideal either. I propose we add new API, scm_call_0_v, scm_apply_3_v, etc. Such code would truncate or raise an error for 0 values. Then we change all internal users to use the new code, if appropriate. WDYT? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/