From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?R8O2cmFu?= Weinholt Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: [bug #31681] string-filter argument order doesn't match SRFI-13 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:15:31 +0000 Message-ID: <20101117-141530.sv2373.84512@savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289999902 2295 80.91.229.12 (17 Nov 2010 13:18:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:18:22 +0000 (UTC) To: =?UTF-8?B?R8O2cmFu?= Weinholt , bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 14:18:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PIhtu-0006XP-RQ for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:18:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51227 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PIhtt-0006Kb-Ak for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:18:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36479 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PIhrJ-0004wp-MD for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:15:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PIhrI-00045N-8i for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:15:33 -0500 Original-Received: from colonialone.fsf.org ([140.186.70.51]:43226 helo=internal.in.savannah.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PIhrI-00045B-6z for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:15:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [10.1.0.103] (helo=frontend.in.savannah.gnu.org) by internal.in.savannah.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PIhrH-0006AO-2A; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:15:31 +0000 Original-Received: from www-data by frontend.in.savannah.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PIhrH-0002sG-0V; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:15:31 +0000 X-Savane-Server: savannah.gnu.org:443 [10.1.0.103] X-Savane-Project: guile X-Savane-Tracker: bugs X-Savane-Item-ID: 31681 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 X-Apparently-From: 95.80.36.26 (Savane authenticated user weinholt) Original-References: In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4860 Archived-At: URL: Summary: string-filter argument order doesn't match SRFI-13 Project: Guile Submitted by: weinholt Submitted on: Wed Nov 17 14:15:30 2010 Category: None Severity: 3 - Normal Item Group: None Status: None Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any _______________________________________________________ Details: This is the order of arguments given by SRFI-13: string-filter char/char-set/pred s [start end] -> string string-delete har/char-set/pred s [start end] -> string This is the order used by Guile: -- Scheme Procedure: string-filter s char_pred [start [end]] -- Scheme Procedure: string-delete s char_pred [start [end]] I think it would be good if the srfi-13 module used the standard argument order. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/