From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fabian Schuetz Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Segmentation Fault in guile-1.8.7 on recent Macbook Pro Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:40:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20101023114021.GA18953@eris.fms-edv.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287847792 27737 80.91.229.12 (23 Oct 2010 15:29:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:29:52 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 23 17:29:51 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P9g2T-00020W-7R for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:29:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57225 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P9g2S-0000zd-MN for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:29:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60399 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P9cSl-0005IR-Hj for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 07:40:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9cSk-00070s-KT for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 07:40:39 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp1.goneo.de ([82.100.220.80]:45245) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9cSk-00070T-Fm for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 07:40:38 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp1.goneo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scan.goneo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40493A3893 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:40:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by goneo Original-Received: from smtp1.goneo.de ([127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.goneo.de (smtp1.goneo.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mRxZoDX1Pt6O for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:40:21 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from alraune (p5B139157.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.19.145.87]) by smtp1.goneo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 643673A3B07 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:40:21 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by alraune (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1B8BA21EEF; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:40:21 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:29:38 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4833 Archived-At: While experimenting with "undefine", I discovered, that=20 even quite important functions, like "write" or "display" can be undefined. The problem is, that calling them after they have been "undefined", leads to an=20 endless regression, displaying a Segmentation fault, when finally interrupted.=20 If I "undefine" list: (undefine list) and call it afterwards: (list 1 2 3 4) I get the expected "ABORT: (unbound-variable) I would be glad to help out, to fix this. Be greeted, Fabian Sch=FCtz