From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?= Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: [bug #30169] Auto-compilation failure of a module doesn't lead to a failure [1.9.11] Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:23:00 +0000 Message-ID: <20100620-142300.sv15145.70745@savannah.gnu.org> References: <20100617-130637.sv15145.59405@savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277043795 31505 80.91.229.12 (20 Jun 2010 14:23:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:23:15 +0000 (UTC) To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?= , bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 20 16:23:13 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQLQW-0003Nk-9c for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:23:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36800 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQLQV-0003eE-J2 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 10:23:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46548 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQLQO-0003dy-IJ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 10:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQLQM-0003Im-VP for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 10:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from colonialone.fsf.org ([140.186.70.51]:34154 helo=internal.in.savannah.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQLQL-0003Hz-6I; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 10:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.1.0.103] (helo=frontend.in.savannah.gnu.org) by internal.in.savannah.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQLQL-00042x-0N; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: from www-data by frontend.in.savannah.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQLQK-0007O2-KO; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:23:00 +0000 X-Savane-Server: savannah.gnu.org:443 [10.1.0.103] X-Savane-Project: guile X-Savane-Tracker: bugs X-Savane-Item-ID: 30169 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (GNU; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100107 IceCat/3.6 (like Firefox/3.6) X-Apparently-From: 80.67.176.83 (Savane authenticated user civodul) In-Reply-To: <20100617-130637.sv15145.59405@savannah.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4683 Archived-At: Follow-up Comment #1, bug #30169 (project guile): (Follow-up from bug-guile.) Andy says: > Some files may be interpreted, but fail to compile. OK. [...] > So, you want Guile to fail faster for this error; how do you distinguish > it from eval-when errors as above? Or would you prefer that eval-when > errors lead to failures as well? Do you mean that, for programs written to be interpreted, which lack proper ‘eval-when’ clauses, the idea was to fall back to interpretation when auto-compilation fails? That would indeed be friendlier to programs written for previous versions of Guile. However, in the example I gave, somehow, an error should occur. With 1.8 you would get an error when reading ‘foo.scm’, whereas here it’s just silently ignored, which sounds wrong. Ludo'. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/