From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: [bug #30117] Funky name for one of the root modules Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:52:14 +0000 Message-ID: <20100614-095214.sv20118.63979@savannah.gnu.org> References: <20100611-153911.sv424.75990@savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276510007 7405 80.91.229.12 (14 Jun 2010 10:06:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:06:47 +0000 (UTC) To: Andy Wingo , Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz , bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 14 12:06:46 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO6Yx-00034J-NX for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:06:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47206 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OO6Yt-0007eU-SP for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 06:06:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38701 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OO6L4-0000DK-Qt for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:52:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO6L3-0000ZS-Nz for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:52:18 -0400 Original-Received: from colonialone.fsf.org ([140.186.70.51]:48330 helo=internal.in.savannah.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO6L1-0000YE-Uj; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:52:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.1.0.103] (helo=frontend.in.savannah.gnu.org) by internal.in.savannah.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO6L0-0006SU-PF; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:52:14 +0000 Original-Received: from www-data by frontend.in.savannah.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO6L0-0005dP-Kg; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:52:14 +0000 X-Savane-Server: savannah.gnu.org:443 [10.1.0.103] X-Savane-Project: guile X-Savane-Tracker: bugs X-Savane-Item-ID: 30117 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.5.9-2.fc12 Firefox/3.5.9 X-Apparently-From: 80.24.4.74 (Savane authenticated user wingo) In-Reply-To: <20100611-153911.sv424.75990@savannah.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4658 Archived-At: Follow-up Comment #1, bug #30117 (project guile): >From the NEWS: ** All modules have names now Before, you could have anonymous modules: modules without names. Now, because of hygiene and macros, all modules have names. If a module was created without a name, the first time `module-name' is called on it, a fresh name will be lazily generated for it. Should we have a flag on these modules to indicate that they are really anonymous? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/