From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Bill Schottstaedt" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: guile 1.9.0 scm_read_hash_extend gc trouble Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:19:58 -0700 Message-ID: <20090624101901.M65125@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> References: <20090621120823.M97037@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> <873a9tr46q.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <87skhtpolb.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <20090622171923.M95660@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> <87bpof7sw3.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1245838840 1890 80.91.229.12 (24 Jun 2009 10:20:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:20:40 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 24 12:20:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MJPai-0002ww-Mu for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:20:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43569 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJPah-0004KQ-KD for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:20:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJPaI-0004B4-ME for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJPaD-00049P-19 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:20:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53203 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJPaC-00049G-R8 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:20:00 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp4.stanford.edu ([171.67.219.84]:35987) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJPaC-0002x4-Ax for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:20:00 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp4.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 818CDC615 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from cm-mail.stanford.edu (cm-mail.Stanford.EDU [171.64.197.135]) by smtp4.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DACC33C for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ccrma.Stanford.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cm-mail.stanford.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5OAJw21019484 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:19:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87bpof7sw3.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.53 X-OriginatingIP: 71.198.184.220 (bil) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94/9501/Tue Jun 23 21:59:30 2009 on cm-mail.stanford.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4246 Archived-At: > Can you confirm that it allows you to build Guile with 32-bit offsets and Snd > with 64-bit offsets (or vice versa)? Yes, I think it is ok.