From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Bill Schottstaedt" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: big number printout Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:53:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20080704002804.M78915@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> References: <20080702222810.M95646@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> <49dd78620807031458g7281c63dx86e9cb42dc425226@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1215132798 32082 80.91.229.12 (4 Jul 2008 00:53:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 00:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: "Neil Jerram" Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 04 02:54:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KEZYp-000680-MR for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:54:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51995 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KEZXy-0004YB-VI for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:53:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KEZXu-0004Xv-W4 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:53:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KEZXt-0004Xi-D4 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45776 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KEZXt-0004Xf-8O for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu ([171.67.20.26]:43592) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KEZXt-0001SI-6w for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EF9A60EB4B; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from cm-mail.stanford.edu (cm-mail.Stanford.EDU [171.64.197.135]) by smtp3.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABBD60E8D6; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ccrma.stanford.edu (ccrma.stanford.edu [171.64.197.141]) by cm-mail.stanford.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m640r06a032126; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:53:00 -0700 Original-Received: from ccrma.Stanford.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ccrma.stanford.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.5) with ESMTP id m640r0gh019705; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:53:00 -0700 In-Reply-To: <49dd78620807031458g7281c63dx86e9cb42dc425226@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 67.161.21.103 (bil) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/7632/Thu Jul 3 13:36:22 2008 on cm-mail.stanford.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3921 Archived-At: > Is this an important problem for you in practice? What's the impact? > (Asking for prioritization purposes...) What? Is this something new that Guile prioritizes bug reports? Decide for yourself.