From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bruno Haible Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: guile 1.8.5 test failure: srfi-14.test Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 00:50:56 +0200 Message-ID: <200805310050.56539.bruno@clisp.org> References: <200805160043.56735.bruno@clisp.org> <87d4njnx2y.fsf@gnu.org> <200805270233.02197.bruno@clisp.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212187885 3960 80.91.229.12 (30 May 2008 22:51:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 22:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: "Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?=" Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 31 00:52:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K2DS4-00039E-P8 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 May 2008 00:52:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59273 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K2DRJ-0007Gl-2e for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 18:51:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K2DRF-0007GX-Cz for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 18:51:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K2DRE-0007G7-7L for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 18:51:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45400 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K2DRE-0007Fz-30 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 18:51:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.188]:52286) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2DR7-0003yd-2f; Fri, 30 May 2008 18:51:01 -0400 X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 X-RZG-AUTH: gMysVb8JT2gB+rFDu0PuvnvUUGmhfq1rhHRG5dSek381RH36P6qeSYZcEQ== Original-Received: from linuix.haible.de (dslb-084-058-050-227.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.58.50.227]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo20) (RZmta 16.38) with ESMTP id z06464k4UGwIGJ ; Sat, 31 May 2008 00:50:59 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from: ) User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 In-Reply-To: <200805270233.02197.bruno@clisp.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3883 Archived-At: > > The cardinals of these char sets were taken from SRFI-14: > > > > http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-14/srfi-14.html#StandardCharsetDefs This text also contains the complete lists of 117 characters for 'letter'. Comparing it with the 124 characters that I got, the differences are at #\246 U+00A6 BROKEN BAR #\250 U+00A8 DIAERESIS #\264 U+00B4 ACUTE ACCENT #\270 U+00B8 CEDILLA #\274 U+00BC VULGAR FRACTION ONE QUARTER #\275 U+00BD VULGAR FRACTION ONE HALF #\276 U+00BE VULGAR FRACTION THREE QUARTERS The Unicode classification of these characters has not changed between Unicode 3.0 and Unicode 5.0. But these are exactly the byte values which differ between ISO-8859-1 and ISO-8859-15. $ LC_ALL=de_DE.iso88591 locale -c LC_CTYPE | head -6 LC_CTYPE upper;lower;alpha;digit;xdigit;space;print;graph;blank;cntrl;punct;alnum;combining;combining_level3 toupper;tolower;totitle 16 1 ISO-8859-15 Oops. My system has a locale called 'de_DE.iso88591' which is in fact using ISO-8859-15. Not a bug in guile. Sorry for the noise. Bruno