From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: divoplade Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#44186: Recursive mkdir Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 08:17:47 +0200 Message-ID: <1a7ae91ae083eecc3ab1043e8ed571bfe972c3a4.camel@divoplade.fr> References: <6ff632f5c1e378647cecc7177b7018fb8a0ee6d4.camel@divoplade.fr> <86sga420pw.fsf@gmail.com> <21802e695ea4472c8aba0a686e6bf025890c64d6.camel@divoplade.fr> <20201023233214.GA13637@LionPure> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13416"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 Cc: 44186@debbugs.gnu.org To: Bengt Richter , zimoun Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 24 08:18:08 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kWCsR-0003O9-AW for guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 08:18:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54494 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWCsP-0006RY-V3 for guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45722) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWCsM-0006RQ-H1 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWCsM-00072s-6m for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kWCsM-0005Ai-1o for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: divoplade Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 06:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44186 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile Original-Received: via spool by 44186-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44186.160352027819872 (code B ref 44186); Sat, 24 Oct 2020 06:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44186) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2020 06:17:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58881 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kWCsI-0005AR-6H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:17:58 -0400 Original-Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:46659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kWCsF-0005A8-0c for 44186@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:17:57 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 86.202.110.111 Original-Received: from divoplade.home (lfbn-lyo-1-15-111.w86-202.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.202.110.111]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E69C60006; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 06:17:47 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <20201023233214.GA13637@LionPure> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:9907 Archived-At: Hello, Le samedi 24 octobre 2020 à 01:32 +0200, Bengt Richter a écrit : > An alternate solution could be programmed using ffi, as documented in > [1], n'est-ce pas? To be clear, you would rather have that function as guile code rather than extending the C function? I'm OK with that, but in which file should I put that function? My instinct was to put the code near the mkdir function, and that happened to be in a C file, so I went C. > What would guix best-practice guidance say about that? I'm not sure to follow, now this is a guile matter, guix has nothing to do about it. I'm sorry I messed a few things up with the mailing lists (I should have listened to them, "don't cross the streams"). Could you elaborate? Best regards, divoplade