From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ebuy Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: typo/bug in guile-bf08e10/doc/ref/api-control.texi Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:47:08 +0200 Message-ID: <1283550428.7803.20.camel@melody> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-ZbPlZrAczM/CP3JlXmnW" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283557987 3487 80.91.229.12 (3 Sep 2010 23:53:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:53:07 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 04 01:53:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Org49-0005sA-U4 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:53:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48994 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Org49-0005YJ-DQ for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46435 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ore6N-0001y1-3k for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:47:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ore6L-0005BA-Vn for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:47:14 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:61450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ore6L-0005Af-E1 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:47:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.20] (port-92-204-120-88.dynamic.qsc.de [92.204.120.88]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M21ZH-1OcaHu4B35-00tSnT; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:47:10 +0200 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:MBLAaHwKu0vMyWkcYA1/56vaYaOmP562uJPB1QOnvuV EPWUebJWn6uUvQoWxN8vxXUYlPq1/zY3VwNIXZB67nsRIRR9YB PxTOP6+uy/P/O9QDYmF3XwNWx8i8/cMDoCYNK0OnSPOiXJ98VA B+7GICCkP09Bu3IOzp0TJdwbNctmMHrF8tbxFywVkVUsVWhw6S vRDK29GvPMlU71A/wj5pw== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:52:50 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4756 Archived-At: --=-ZbPlZrAczM/CP3JlXmnW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, maybe I'm wrong, but I consider the order "(PROC CONT)" in the documentation of the procedure "call-with-current-continuation" in file guile-bf08e10/doc/ref/api-control.texi of the git-repository a bug Shouldn't that be transposed? "(CONT PROC)" ? I originally found this studying the documentation of my current 1.8.7 release of guile and wondered, if its still present in the development branch. Bye - Some Admiring Guile-User and Enlgisch Non-Native speaker:) --=-ZbPlZrAczM/CP3JlXmnW Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="diff-c.txt" Content-Type: text/plain; name="diff-c.txt"; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit *** api-control.texi.new 2010-09-03 23:09:44.671311883 +0200 --- guile-bf08e10/doc/ref/api-control.texi 2010-09-03 16:23:02.000000000 +0200 *************** *** 488,495 **** @deffn {Scheme Procedure} call-with-current-continuation proc @deffnx {Scheme Procedure} call/cc proc @rnindex call-with-current-continuation ! Capture the current continuation and call @code{(@var{cont} @var{proc})} ! with it. The return value is the value returned by @var{proc}, or when @code{(@var{cont} @var{value})} is later invoked, the return is the @var{value} passed. --- 488,495 ---- @deffn {Scheme Procedure} call-with-current-continuation proc @deffnx {Scheme Procedure} call/cc proc @rnindex call-with-current-continuation ! Capture the current continuation and call @code{(@var{proc} ! @var{cont})} with it. The return value is the value returned by @var{proc}, or when @code{(@var{cont} @var{value})} is later invoked, the return is the @var{value} passed. --=-ZbPlZrAczM/CP3JlXmnW--