* scm_num_eq
@ 2004-01-23 0:55 Roland Orre
2004-01-23 1:21 ` scm_num_eq Marius Vollmer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Roland Orre @ 2004-01-23 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
This code gives the expected result:
if (SCM_EQ_P(SCM_CDR(handle),SCM_MAKINUM(0)))
but this code doesn't:
if (scm_num_eq_p(SCM_CDR(handle),SCM_MAKINUM(0)))
as this latter code always gives false back.
I guess it wouldn't matter how the background is, but this
is the case. The key cell is a local variable.
scm_t_cell key;
SCM tmp;
SCM_SETCAR((SCM)&key,SCM_MAKE_STRING_TAG (slen));
SCM_SETCDR((SCM)&key,(scm_t_bits) str);
SCM handle=
scm_hash_fn_create_handle_x (table, (SCM) &key, SCM_MAKINUM(0),
scm_ihash, scm_sloppy_assoc, 0);
Best regards
Roland Orre
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: scm_num_eq
2004-01-23 0:55 scm_num_eq Roland Orre
@ 2004-01-23 1:21 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-01-23 8:35 ` scm_num_eq Roland Orre
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marius Vollmer @ 2004-01-23 1:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: bug-guile
Roland Orre <roland.orre@neurologic.se> writes:
> Hi,
> This code gives the expected result:
> if (SCM_EQ_P(SCM_CDR(handle),SCM_MAKINUM(0)))
>
> but this code doesn't:
> if (scm_num_eq_p(SCM_CDR(handle),SCM_MAKINUM(0)))
>
> as this latter code always gives false back.
Hmm, it should always be true: scm_num_eq returns either SCM_BOOL_F or
SCM_BOOL_T which are both true in the eyes of C. Try this:
if (!SCM_NFALSEP (scm_num_eq_p(SCM_CDR(handle),SCM_MAKINUM(0))))
(Why don't we have SCM_TRUEP?)
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: scm_num_eq
2004-01-23 1:21 ` scm_num_eq Marius Vollmer
@ 2004-01-23 8:35 ` Roland Orre
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Roland Orre @ 2004-01-23 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: bug-guile
Whoops, I must have been tired when I wrote that line (OK, it was late)
I didn't notice that scm_num_eq returned SCM, and yes,you were right, it
did always return true, not false as I had claimed. Thanks!
Best regards
Roland
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 02:21, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Roland Orre <roland.orre@neurologic.se> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > This code gives the expected result:
> > if (SCM_EQ_P(SCM_CDR(handle),SCM_MAKINUM(0)))
> >
> > but this code doesn't:
> > if (scm_num_eq_p(SCM_CDR(handle),SCM_MAKINUM(0)))
> >
> > as this latter code always gives false back.
>
> Hmm, it should always be true: scm_num_eq returns either SCM_BOOL_F or
> SCM_BOOL_T which are both true in the eyes of C. Try this:
>
> if (!SCM_NFALSEP (scm_num_eq_p(SCM_CDR(handle),SCM_MAKINUM(0))))
>
> (Why don't we have SCM_TRUEP?)
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-23 8:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-23 0:55 scm_num_eq Roland Orre
2004-01-23 1:21 ` scm_num_eq Marius Vollmer
2004-01-23 8:35 ` scm_num_eq Roland Orre
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).