From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>, Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: `completion-in-region'
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:46:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <z2me01d8a51004120246q1ea43e11m76e967f32886531c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwv39z1xw25.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Stefan Monnier
<monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>>> If you use ".*?a.*?b.*?c", then yes it gives the
>>> same matches but it also has the same O(N^3) worst case.
>
>> This is not the right place perhaps to educate me on this, but to me
>> it looks like just three linear searches with the summed length for
>> the searches equal to that of the candidate strings. Is not that O(N)?
>
> When matched against "ababab", it will do the following:
> - search for a in the string.
> - for each match of a, search for b in the remaining string.
I do not understand the "for each" here. I thought that since ".*?" is
greedy that means that only the first "a" could match.
But maybe I am missing that the first ".*?" is not anchored. Would
"^.*?a.*?b.*?c" behave differently?
> - for each match of b, search for c in the remaining string.
>
> These are 3 nested loops, each of them doing a number of iterations
> proportional to N, so you get O(N^3) complexity.
>
>
> Stefan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-12 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-06 14:37 `completion-in-region' Leo
2010-04-09 3:05 ` `completion-in-region' Stefan Monnier
2010-04-11 12:56 ` `completion-in-region' Leo
2010-04-11 15:32 ` `completion-in-region' Stefan Monnier
2010-04-11 18:05 ` `completion-in-region' Drew Adams
2010-04-11 19:44 ` `completion-in-region' Stefan Monnier
2010-04-11 19:56 ` `completion-in-region' Drew Adams
2010-04-11 20:49 ` `completion-in-region' Stefan Monnier
2010-04-11 21:13 ` `completion-in-region' Drew Adams
2010-04-11 20:08 ` `completion-in-region' Lennart Borgman
2010-04-11 20:51 ` `completion-in-region' Stefan Monnier
2010-04-11 21:06 ` `completion-in-region' Lennart Borgman
2010-04-12 2:10 ` `completion-in-region' Stefan Monnier
2010-04-12 9:46 ` Lennart Borgman [this message]
2010-04-12 13:10 ` `completion-in-region' Stefan Monnier
2010-04-12 14:50 ` `completion-in-region' Davis Herring
2010-04-11 21:12 ` `completion-in-region' Drew Adams
2010-04-12 15:36 ` `completion-in-region' Leo
2010-04-12 18:10 ` `completion-in-region' Stefan Monnier
2010-04-12 15:51 ` `completion-in-region' Leo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=z2me01d8a51004120246q1ea43e11m76e967f32886531c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lennart.borgman@gmail.com \
--cc=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=sdl.web@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.