From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10506: 24.0.92; Visiting the Guile v2.0.3 tarball shows binary garbage Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:40:32 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83ty3yhtxj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326850873 1995 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2012 01:41:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10506@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 18 02:41:09 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RnKWQ-0008Hl-Dn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:41:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33377 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RnKWP-00054e-Vk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:41:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RnKWL-00054Z-Gx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RnKWJ-0002h8-Pp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:41:01 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39340) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RnKWJ-0002gp-O0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:40:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RnKXK-00020A-4N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10506 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10506-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10506.13268509007667 (code B ref 10506); Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10506) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2012 01:41:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34013 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RnKWy-0001zc-Dz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:41:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:40807) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RnKWu-0001zT-JA for 10506@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:41:38 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RnKVs-0001AF-Qe; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:40:32 -0500 X-Spook: Indigo HAMASMOIS Kh-11 Legion of Doom Iran MILSATCOM X-Ran: Ye@KFGPN\_TpsF<0Ms*huuJ2Bf_L/WuA]1U8,rQ]ui|*)XIC0nN141*Y4VY>BaosXehazb X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:27:52 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55834 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > A final comment: it seems to me that anything in auto-coding-alist with > a no-conversion* coding should be in inhibit-first-line-modes-regexps as > well, since the meaning in both cases is basically "this is a binary > file". Are there any exceptions? Perhaps the compression ones (gz etc) are exceptions, eg in case one visits foo.txt.gz (though I haven't looked how jka-compr actually handles such things).